Total of 16 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri 27 Dec 2019 12:53:06 AM EST
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
25.00% |4 | 18.06% |38020 | i...@arin.net
12.50% |2 | 18.88% |39741 |
Responses are inline;
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 6:38 PM Fernando Frediani
wrote:
> There are two points to analyze in this proposal:
>
> - Any returned, reclaimed or revoked addresses that belong originally to
> the reserved pools to be returned to them. I think this was pretty
> obvious and was
Agreed. Support this for the time being.
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
Support. At some future point it may make sense to
eliminate (or reduce the size of) the reserved pools,
but until we have consensus as to how to right-size
those pools, they should have priority to top them
off.
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this
Support. Because I don’t ever see us allocating directly; instead
everything will be placed on the wait list. It’s a bit annoying joining
thinking you qualify for a /21 then have to submit significant
justification to get a second /22 (bringing you to a /21).
Michael
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at
There are two points to analyze in this proposal:
- Any returned, reclaimed or revoked addresses that belong originally to
the reserved pools to be returned to them. I think this was pretty
obvious and was already done this way and wouldn't be necessary to state
it again. Could the author
Support this proposal.
Make sense to harmonize given the current scenario. In other RIRs it
works or is planned to work in the same way.
Regards
Fernando Frediani
On 24/12/2019 11:38, ARIN wrote:
On 19 December 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
"ARIN-prop-279: Harmonization of
