Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion

2020-01-29 Thread Martin Hannigan
I'll let the proposal speak for itself. Not in favor. On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:23 AM ARIN wrote: > The following has been revised: > > * Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion > > Revised text is below and can be found at: > >

[arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - January 2020

2020-01-29 Thread Sean Hopkins
In accordance with the Policy Development Process (PDP), the Advisory Council met on 24 January 2020. The AC has advanced the following Recommended Draft Policy to the Board of Trustees for review: * ARIN-2018-6: Clarify Reassignment Requirements in 4.2.3.7.1 The AC has abandoned the

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion

2020-01-29 Thread Brian Jones
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:34 AM Andrew Dul wrote: > I would say as a continuing ARIN member they are responsible for keeping > up their POC and abuse records just like any other member. > > Andrew > Point being, if those address blocks are ignored long enough, they could be reclaimed

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2019-12: M Legal Jurisdiction Exclusion

2020-01-29 Thread Andrew Dul
I would say as a continuing ARIN member they are responsible for keeping up their POC and abuse records just like any other member. Andrew On 1/28/2020 11:52 AM, Brian Jones wrote: > > Question: Does this mean that the entity responsible for the continued > resource holdings is subject to