Total of 25 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri 17 Apr 2020 12:53:07 AM EDT
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
16.00% |4 | 12.61% |63880 | jsweet...@arin.net
12.00% |3 | 13.90% |70457 |
On 24 Mar 2020, at 1:20 PM, ARIN mailto:i...@arin.net>> wrote:
...
Reserving /40s only for organizations initially expanding into IPv6 from an
initial sliver of IPv4 space will help to narrowly address the problem observed
by Registration Services while avoiding unintended consequences by
Looks to me not some but MOST. I agree, we should not put a fee doubling
in the way of these 3x folks doing the right thing and getting IPv6.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020, Brian Jones wrote:
Looking at the numbers John posted concerning this
Support
On 4/16/2020 10:32 AM, Brian Jones wrote:
Looking at the numbers John posted concerning this issue, it tends to /look
like/ some of these 3x small folks decided to drop their request once they
encountered the price increase. If this is the case then we should move
forward with this
Looking at the numbers John posted concerning this issue, it tends to *look
like* some of these 3x small folks decided to drop their request once they
encountered the price increase. If this is the case then we should move
forward with this proposal. We do not want to create a situation where
When in the application process are the isps informed that their fees will
increase if they accept the ipv6 block? Is that in the ipv6 approved email and
then the tickets are abandoned?
.Andrew
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 4:19 AM, hostmas...@uneedus.com wrote:
>
> Is that very much because they
Is that very much because they found out if they accepted the IPv6 space,
their fees would double???
If so, this PROVES the need to adopt this plan. We should not have things
in place that prevent IPv6 adoption. We have already decided that IPv6
should be cost neutral. Lets fix this glitch
Yes that is exactly what it means. After approval they decided for whatever
reason they no longer wanted the resource.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 1:56 AM, John Santos wrote:
>
> What does "closed with no action" mean? Does it mean the RSP abandoned the
> request?
>
>
>>
