Re: [arin-ppml] [Ext] [FEEDBACK] Anyone else notice that the base whois are not getting maintained well lately?

2019-10-23 Thread Owen DeLong
Michael, While whois is (for better or worse) still in wide use today, the reality is that it does not make sense to put further development effort into it. In reality, the widespread use of the whois protocol is not what needs to be accommodated here, but rather the hobbit people have of

Re: [arin-ppml] [Ext] [FEEDBACK] Anyone else notice that the base whois are not getting maintained well lately?

2019-10-22 Thread Michael Peddemors
On 2019-10-22 5:49 p.m., Michael Peddemors wrote: Okay, another case of me rushing emails, and not being clear enough. First of all, the 'whois' protocol, in spite of all the talk of RDAP, is still a highly used protocol worldwide.  But for the most part, this was designed before IP run out

Re: [arin-ppml] [Ext] [FEEDBACK] Anyone else notice that the base whois are not getting maintained well lately?

2019-10-22 Thread Michael Peddemors
Okay, another case of me rushing emails, and not being clear enough. First of all, the 'whois' protocol, in spite of all the talk of RDAP, is still a highly used protocol worldwide. But for the most part, this was designed before IP run out and the creation of so many cases of inter-RIR

Re: [arin-ppml] [Ext] [FEEDBACK] Anyone else notice that the base whois are not getting maintained well lately?

2019-10-22 Thread Leo Vegoda
On 10/21/19, 4:35 PM, "ARIN-PPML on behalf of Michael Peddemors" wrote: [...] > You would think that if this has been transferred to ARIN back in 2017, > that the standard 'whois' commands would by now return more recent > information. I suggest using RDAP as the least hassle way of having a