Please forgive my ignorance of the details of the policy development process,
but based on what I can see from looking at the timelines for other proposals
on the ARIN website, it doesn't appear to me that this policy has any time left
to be relevant. It appears that the proposal would need to
On Sep 4, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Bill Owens ow...@nysernet.org wrote:
Please forgive my ignorance of the details of the policy development process,
but based on what I can see from looking at the timelines for other proposals
on the ARIN website, it doesn't appear to me that this policy has any
On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_18.html
You are encouraged
+1, I agree completely.
On 9/4/2014 午前 02:29, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
I agree with Seth. Oppose ARIN-2014-18.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below
On 9/3/14, 12:03, Martin Hannigan wrote:
So we should strand fragments and fail to adapt to the changing world
and rely on policy relics (multi homing) to deny people access to
address space?
I don't know what this means.
~Seth
___
PPML
You are
What Seth said; oppose 2014-18
/RjL
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
ARIN-prop-210 Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments as a
Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is
Problem Statement:
New and small organizations are having a difficult time receiving resource
allocations from ARIN because of the economic, administrative and time
burdens of making their way through ARIN's needs testing process. For small
I haven't seen any evidence of this.
Hello all,
If you had to guess, how long would you think before I can order
up a /22 (4 class C's) from Arin? I am trying to decide if I
need to fudge the truth and order up a /21
Best regards,
On 9/2/14, 12:57, Derek Calanchini wrote:
If you had to guess, how long would you think before I can order up a
/22 (4 class C's) from Arin? I am trying to decide if I need to fudge
the truth and order up a /21
Not to be too pedantic, but you probably won't be able to get 4 class
C's even
I want one!
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
Behalf Of Gary Buhrmaster
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:10 PM
To: Mike Burns
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying
Opposed, based on reasons already provided in this thread.
Cheers,
Christoph
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:58 AM, ARIN i...@arin.net wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy
On 14-07-24 08:35 AM, Christoph Blecker wrote:
Where this is in conflict with any other Section in the Policy Manual,
this Section shall be controlling.”
Could it be this line that is creating opposition?
I am in favor of allowing smaller allocations.. but maybe there are some
very specific
I think the bigger problem is the concept as a whole.
To qualify for a /24 (which will be the new minimum for end users and ISPs
alike if the ARIN Board adopts 2014-13, which has been recommended to it),
you need to justify the use of 204 addresses in the next three months. This
is an extremely
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Christoph Blecker cblec...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the bigger problem is the concept as a whole.
To qualify for a /24 (which will be the new minimum for end users and ISPs
alike if the ARIN Board adopts 2014-13, which has been recommended to it),
you need
Opposed, as I do not see the need to justify 200 addresses as enough
of a burden to outweigh the benefits of not giving out /24s like candy
to those who cannot when coupled with the likely to be implemented
minimum /24 size allocation to an ORG.
The laws of physics cause this to be needed, due to
-
From: Blake Dunlap
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:17 PM
To: ARIN
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net List
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum
Allocations and Assignments
Opposed, as I do not see the need to justify 200 addresses as enough
of a burden to outweigh
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Mike Burns m...@iptrading.com wrote:
. How else are we going to get rid of the more than
1,000 /24s left as the dregs of decades of allocations?
Well, you could always reintroduce the proposal that
everyone who commented (on that proposal proposal)
would get
18 matches
Mail list logo
