- increase the reserve pool to a /15
- increase the minimum allocation for an IXP to a /22
Quadrupling the allocation while doubling the pool halves the number of IXPs
served, and I think it would be unfortunate and short-sighted to let that
happen.
To inject some facts into the debate:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Martin Hannigan hanni...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks.
The discussion in the Open-IX community seems to support a CI change
related to IXPs in the following manners:
- use sparse allocations for CI space
Helps to avoid renumbering of growing CI. We will use the
On 9/30/14, 18:12 , Bill Woodcock wrote:
- increase the reserve pool to a /15
- increase the minimum allocation for an IXP to a /22
Quadrupling the allocation while doubling the pool halves the number of IXPs
served, and I think it would be unfortunate and short-sighted to let that
happen.
A more rational threshold for that measurement would be 248 or even 240
participants.
Consider most IXPs have at least a couple of route servers (2 IPs) and likely
need some numbers for the physical infrastructure of the IXP. Additionally,
there are only 254 usable IP addresses in a /24, and
On Sep 29, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Martin Hannigan hanni...@gmail.com wrote:
In a discussion within the OIX standards community, there is support
for asking ARIN to sparsely allocate micro allocation space for IXPs
on /23. The only question is, how should we proceed? Ask ARIN directly
or submit a
Andrew,
There was a discussion yesterday on the Open-IX standards list:
http://bit.ly/OIX-ARIN-20140926
Summarizing:
- Zero support for your proposed changes impacting IXPs.
Hope that helps.
Best,
-M
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Martin Hannigan hanni...@gmail.com wrote:
If I
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Andrew Dul andrew@quark.net wrote:
Hello,
At the Chicago meeting there was some discussion around the
micro-allocation policy (section 4.4) of the NRPM. I committed to the AC
to produce a draft update to this section based upon feedback that I heard
If I were going to change anything with micro allocations I would change:
- Make RIRs singular as in ARIN, not all of them.
- Remove the policy term and make it permanent
IXP growth has changed dramatically since the policy was written.
I'm not sure I understand the desire to change to a /26?
: Andrew Dul [mailto:andrew@quark.net]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:22 AM
To: David Huberman; arin-ppml@arin.net; Andrew Dul
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Micro-allocation policy proposal draft
David,
If the last section was changed to...
Other critical infrastructure such as core
Hello,
At the Chicago meeting there was some discussion around the
micro-allocation policy (section 4.4) of the NRPM. I committed to the
AC to produce a draft update to this section based upon feedback that I
heard from the community. Below you will find a draft update.
This has not yet been
?This text concerns me:
Other critical infrastructure which is not defined in other sub-sections of
section 4.4,
may receive allocations from ARIN, when operational need can be demonstrated.
Can you please give us a real-world example? The pre-defined list of critical
operators has
[mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of David Huberman
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:05 AM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net; Andrew Dul
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Micro-allocation policy proposal draft
This text concerns me:
Other critical infrastructure which is not defined in other sub-sections
On 14-09-22 10:56 AM, Andrew Dul wrote:
These allocations will be no smaller than a /26.
Should you also indicate the 'max' covered by micro allocations?
--
Catch the Magic of Linux...
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO
On 9/22/2014 11:05 AM, David Huberman wrote:
This text concerns me:
Other critical infrastructure which is not defined in other
sub-sections of section 4.4,
may receive allocations from ARIN, when operational need can be
demonstrated.
Can you please give us a real-world example?
, 2014 11:22 AM
To: David Huberman; arin-ppml@arin.net; Andrew Dul
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Micro-allocation policy proposal draft
David,
If the last section was changed to...
Other critical infrastructure such as core DNS service providers (e.g.
ICANN-sanctioned root and ccTLD operators) as well
15 matches
Mail list logo
