On Apr 8, 2016 7:26 PM, "David Farmer" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Scott Leibrand
wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, John.
>>
>> It sounds to me like ARIN is already doing the right thing (saving
2-byte ASNs for people who specifically want them), and
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Scott Leibrand
wrote:
> Thanks, John.
>
> It sounds to me like ARIN is already doing the right thing (saving 2-byte
> ASNs for people who specifically want them), and that is sufficient for the
> time being. It does not appear that
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>
> Thanks, John.
>
> It sounds to me like ARIN is already doing the right thing (saving 2-byte
> ASNs for people who specifically want them), and that is sufficient for the
> time being. It does not appear that
Thanks, John.
It sounds to me like ARIN is already doing the right thing (saving 2-byte
ASNs for people who specifically want them), and that is sufficient for the
time being. It does not appear that additional restrictions on who may
request a 2-byte ASN are necessary at this time. If at some
Folks -
Please forgive this omnibus email of information, but we've had sufficient
individual
questions for 2-byte ASN data that it simply made more sense to provide one
full
summary rather than reply to each question individually...
ARIN continues to have classic, 2-byte, AS numbers in