Re: [arin-ppml] LAST CALL for Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1: Reserved Pool Transfer Policy

[Brian Jones]

Support with the changes concerning the reserved pool.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:18 PM ARIN  wrote:

> The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 21 October 2016 and decided to
> send Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1: Reserved Pool Transfer Policy
> to Last Call:
>
> The AC provided the following statement to the community:
>
> This proposal is technically sound and enables fair and impartial number
> policy by ensuring that the number resources are used in accordance with
> the terms under which they were granted.  There is significant support
> for this change within the Internet community. Re: Merge into 2016-5.
> The new text "Address resources from a reserved pool (including those
> designated in Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer."
> should be added to the revised 2016-5 sections 8.3 & 8.4 "Conditions on
> source of the transfer:”.
>
> Feedback is encouraged during the Last Call period. All comments should
> be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. This Last Call will
> expire on 9 November 2016. After Last Call, the AC will conduct their
> Last Call review.
>
> The full text is below and available at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/
>
> The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
>
> Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1: Reserved Pool Transfer Policy
>
> AC assessment of conformance with the Principles of Internet Number
> Resource Policy:
>
> This proposal enables fair and impartial number resource administration
> by ensuring that IPv4 resources, which are specially designated for
> critical infrastructure and IPv6 transition, are readily available for
> many years into the future. This is done by ensuring the resources
> remain in their originally designated pool rather than being moved into
> the general IPv4 address pool via a transfer. This proposal is
> technically sound and is supported by the community.
>
> Problem Statement:
>
> Section 8 of the current NRPM does not distinguish between the transfer
> of blocks from addresses that have been reserved for specific uses and
> other addresses that can be transferred. In sections 4.4 and 4.10 there
> are specific address blocks set aside, based on the need for critical
> infrastructure and IPv6 transitions. Two issues arise if transfers of
> reserved address space occur under the current language of section 8.
> First, if transfers of 4.4 or 4.10 space occur under the current policy
> requirements set forth in sections 8.3 and 8.4, the recipients will be
> able to acquire space that was originally reserved for a specific
> purpose without ever providing evidence that they will be using the
> space for either critical infrastructure or IPv6 transition. Second, if
> we allow an allocation or assignment from the block reserved in section
> 4.10 to be transferred out of the region, it would complicate the single
> aggregate from which providers are being asked to allow in block sizes
> smaller than a /24. This policy would limit the transfer of addresses
> from reserved pools.
>
> Policy statement:
>
> Add to Section 8.3 and Section 8.4 under the "Conditions on source of
> the transfer:"
>
> Address resources from a reserved pool (including those designated in
> Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer.
>
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
> ___
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
___
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

[arin-ppml] LAST CALL for Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1: Reserved Pool Transfer Policy

[ARIN]

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 21 October 2016 and decided to 
send Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1: Reserved Pool Transfer Policy 
to Last Call:


The AC provided the following statement to the community:

This proposal is technically sound and enables fair and impartial number 
policy by ensuring that the number resources are used in accordance with 
the terms under which they were granted.  There is significant support 
for this change within the Internet community. Re: Merge into 2016-5. 
The new text "Address resources from a reserved pool (including those 
designated in Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer." 
should be added to the revised 2016-5 sections 8.3 & 8.4 "Conditions on 
source of the transfer:”.


Feedback is encouraged during the Last Call period. All comments should 
be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. This Last Call will 
expire on 9 November 2016. After Last Call, the AC will conduct their 
Last Call review.


The full text is below and available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/

The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)



Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1: Reserved Pool Transfer Policy

AC assessment of conformance with the Principles of Internet Number 
Resource Policy:


This proposal enables fair and impartial number resource administration 
by ensuring that IPv4 resources, which are specially designated for 
critical infrastructure and IPv6 transition, are readily available for 
many years into the future. This is done by ensuring the resources 
remain in their originally designated pool rather than being moved into 
the general IPv4 address pool via a transfer. This proposal is 
technically sound and is supported by the community.


Problem Statement:

Section 8 of the current NRPM does not distinguish between the transfer 
of blocks from addresses that have been reserved for specific uses and 
other addresses that can be transferred. In sections 4.4 and 4.10 there 
are specific address blocks set aside, based on the need for critical 
infrastructure and IPv6 transitions. Two issues arise if transfers of 
reserved address space occur under the current language of section 8. 
First, if transfers of 4.4 or 4.10 space occur under the current policy 
requirements set forth in sections 8.3 and 8.4, the recipients will be 
able to acquire space that was originally reserved for a specific 
purpose without ever providing evidence that they will be using the 
space for either critical infrastructure or IPv6 transition. Second, if 
we allow an allocation or assignment from the block reserved in section 
4.10 to be transferred out of the region, it would complicate the single 
aggregate from which providers are being asked to allow in block sizes 
smaller than a /24. This policy would limit the transfer of addresses 
from reserved pools.


Policy statement:

Add to Section 8.3 and Section 8.4 under the "Conditions on source of 
the transfer:"


Address resources from a reserved pool (including those designated in 
Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer.


Timetable for implementation: Immediate
___
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.