Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 16

2011-10-26 Thread omalleys
Right. My concerns still are we need to make sure the current patches are getting upstream to f16+ and rawhide. I hate to see time wasted trying to track down already fixed bugs. There are other people working on ARM support ie Ubuntu, and upgraded versions of the software may actually fix

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 16

2011-10-26 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 10/26/2011 10:34 AM, omall...@msu.edu wrote: Can we get away with taking a snapshot of the F15 base and F15 Updates trees, and merge them and call that F15 base? Keeping F15 updates spinning during the F17 work is a sensible thing to do as we could really use a stable ARM Fedora release to

[fedora-arm] Another repository verification check that would be useful

2011-10-26 Thread Daniel Drake
perl-Coro built in armv7hl stage3 but failed in stage4, and hence is only present in stage3. Packages like filelight then were then built successfully into stage4 pulling on perl-Coro from stage3. armv5tel build efforts have cloned stage4's RPM set, but not stage3. So we currently are not