Re: [fedora-arm] builder io isue

2011-12-25 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 12/25/2011 05:25 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: When we were testing build were happening really fast, once we loaded up the build jobs things have become really slow http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=238672 started at 1:19 utc and at 5:18 utc four hours later the

[fedora-arm] Daily F15 ARM-Koji Build Status

2011-12-25 Thread jon . chiappetta
Period: Sat Dec 24 13:05:02 UTC 2011 -- Sun Dec 25 13:05:03 UTC 2011 Errors UnbuiltDifferent WorkingBuilt --- 1118 [-8] 2494 [-30] 57 [0] 12 [-2]6734 [+40]

[fedora-arm] Fedora ARM F-15 Branched report: 201111251 changes

2011-12-25 Thread Fedora ARM Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Dec 25 22:46:21 UTC 2011 Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit New package: acpi-1.5-2.fc15 Command-line ACPI client New package: aspell-0.60.6-14.fc15 Spell checker New package: bindfs-1.8.3-4.fc15 Fuse filesystem to

Re: [fedora-arm] builder io isue

2011-12-25 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 12/25/2011 03:47 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote: On 12/25/2011 06:16 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Allocating builders to individual rather than a single raid volume will help dramatically. Care to explain why? Sure, see below. Is this a proper SAN or just another Linux box with some disks in it?

Re: [fedora-arm] builder io isue

2011-12-25 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 12/26/2011 03:57 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 12/25/2011 03:47 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote: On 12/25/2011 06:16 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Allocating builders to individual rather than a single raid volume will help dramatically. Care to explain why? Sure, see below. Is this a proper SAN

Re: [fedora-arm] builder io isue

2011-12-25 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 12/25/2011 09:06 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: Why not just mount direct via NFS? It'd be a lot quicker, not to mention easier to tune. It'd work for building all but a handful of packages (e.g. zsh), but you could handle that by having a single builder that uses a normal fs that has a policy