We need to do some testing on the buildsystem to iron out a few NFS
issues and do some physical work. I propose taking the farm offline on
Wednesday from 1300-2100 UTC (0800-1700 EDT), any objections?
-Chris
___
arm mailing list
On Mar 19, 2012 8:41 PM, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote:
We need to do some testing on the buildsystem to iron out a few NFS
issues and do some physical work. I propose taking the farm offline on
Wednesday from 1300-2100 UTC (0800-1700 EDT), any objections?
Fine with me. It would be
First stab at a few answers--
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 16:46 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
How are ARM-specific issues such as legacy alignment problems to be
addressed?
ARM v7 systems have hardware fixup for alignment issues, just as x86
does. ARM v5 systems can do fixup in software with a CPU
On 03/19/2012 09:30 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Being a PA carries the obligation that all packages in Fedora will be
available. The proposed avenue of making broken packages temporarily
excludearch is questionable and needs work.
The thing that worries me about the excludearch is that there is
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 21:38 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
1. Packages that are truly x86 specific do not need to be made to work
on ARM. And the packages that depend upon them hopefully don't either,
but there's going to be some issues there.
Note that this goes both ways - there are a
On 03/19/2012 04:46 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
How do packagers test and resolve failures on ARM if they don't own an
ARM device?
I like Chris's suggestion of the simulator- that's good coverage. I'd
also support providing login hosts to... somewhere. Seneca? Spare
systems in PHX? I'm not
