On 03/20/2012 08:00 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 03/20/2012 02:48 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Are alignment problems not considered bugs? It's not just that this will
break code on ARM v7 and IIRC SPARC, but alignment issues also cause
cache line straddling which has a performance impact.
I
On 03/20/12 20:00, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 03/20/2012 02:48 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Are alignment problems not considered bugs? It's not just that this will
break code on ARM v7 and IIRC SPARC, but alignment issues also cause
cache line straddling which has a performance impact.
I took
Chris Tyler wrote:
Otherwise not paying attention to alignment in something like e2fsprogs
could plausibly trash the file system:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680090
Even if sloppy programming is not an issue on later ARMs, IMO the
alignment issues should be treated as bugs
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:28 +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
We do, after a fashion (and then wrap it in some extra layers): it's
called a Live Disc :-)
Indeed, but that's not an installation.
Install to Disk on a live disc dd's the premade ext3/4 filesystem
image to the hard
Will it (is it) ever be possible at some stage to install Fedora(Arm)
using maybe some of the traditional methods of x86*
Maybe Live-USB or even SD?, ios iso?
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Will it (is it) ever be possible at some stage to install Fedora(Arm)
using maybe some of the traditional methods of x86*
Maybe Live-USB or even SD?, ios iso?
Yes it will, it's not possible at the moment. It's being
On 03/21/2012 05:22 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673691
Agreed, alignment fixups must be enabled early.
Ah, I thought this was already resolved. So, er, we just need to
followup on this BZ until it's resolved in rawhide? I see it's already
in
Yes, using one kernel source rpm is working fine for us. It's the long
build time which needs to be overcome.
distcc helps.
distcc helps, I've done it, but until x86 uses distcc in koji, ARM
can't use it either.
___
arm mailing list
Hi folks,
Let's get together on the phone and/or online and have a chat. There's
been a lot of activity in the last couple weeks and it'd be good to
discuss next steps, strategy, etc.
Conference code: 617-759-1337 (no passcode required)
Toll Free Dial-In Number (US Canada): (800) 451-8679
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote:
We need to do some testing on the buildsystem to iron out a few NFS
issues and do some physical work. I propose taking the farm offline on
Wednesday from 1300-2100 UTC (0800-1700 EDT), any objections?
What is the status of
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:15 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote:
We need to do some testing on the buildsystem to iron out a few NFS
issues and do some physical work. I propose taking the farm offline on
Wednesday from 1300-2100
Hi everybody.
This Monday FESCo did an initial review of the ARM team's ARM PA Feature
proposal. As part of that review, they requested we get in touch with
affected groups including releng. While Dennis Gilmore has some
specific plans in mind and was even involved in creating the feature
$ reset ; ./diff/kojicmp.sh f p | tee /tmp/arm.koji.stats.txt
Arch| Deps| Reqs|Config| Build| Make| Unknown
0|46|11|24| 3|60| 4
On 03/21/2012 05:43 PM, Jonathan Chiappetta wrote:
Number of unbuilt/cancelled/building pkgs = 469
Can you describe this one a little better? Is that unique packages or
if there are two versions of a single package built does it add 2 to the
number? Is it just a count of the latest in
14 matches
Mail list logo
