On 05/31/2012 01:50 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
There's one addition I would like to see to the final release criteria:
Updated linker path in gcc and glibc.
Why is that important? We'll drop a compat symlink in anyway,
and no-one should notice the change.
Andrew.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:49:57AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:50 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
There's one addition I would like to see to the final release criteria:
Updated linker path in gcc and glibc.
Why is that important? We'll drop a compat symlink in anyway,
and no-one
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/31/2012 09:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
* the compat symlink on its own isn't enough, changing the filename
means the soname has changed too.
Oh, yuck. I don't remember anyone thinking about that during
the meeting. :-(
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 30 May 2012 14:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com escribió:
Good day all,
As many of you are aware we are not holding the Fedora ARM meeting
this
Thu May 31 09:05:01 EDT 2012
f17 : arm vs PA
Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote |
Missing |
--
2 | 19 | 85 |1 |
On 05/31/2012 01:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
2 reasons:
* it would be nice if people using Fedora create binaries using the
right path for the future
* the compat symlink on its own isn't enough, changing the filename
means the soname has changed too. There's a (quick and very
