Re: [fedora-arm] Agreed linker path changes still not in Fedora

2012-06-08 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 06/08/2012 09:51 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: Since then, distros have done the work necessary to use the linker path that was agreed, making changes in gcc and glibc packages. Some people went with the initial patches that were proposed for the sake of urgency, e.g. Ubuntu built using these

Re: [fedora-arm] Agreed linker path changes still not in Fedora

2012-06-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:01:02AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 06/08/2012 09:51 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: understandable and reasonable. However, those patches have been upstream for several weeks now and it seems nobody has cared enough to pull them into Fedora yet. Steve, We pulled in the

Re: [fedora-arm] Agreed linker path changes still not in Fedora

2012-06-08 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi Steve, *Every* major distro working on ARM has implemented what was agreed by all of us in the conf call. Except Fedora. At this point, the message *seems* to be that Fedora developers just do not care about working with the rest of the community, and that's a real shame. Please, let's