Re: [fedora-arm] ARMv8 Bootstrap Project

2012-11-28 Thread David A. Marlin
On 11/27/2012 11:28 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Al Stone wrote: Or, perhaps we can standardize on a location ... ? /srv/nfs-root or something? Please do generate an image assuming something like that. /srv is the FHS location and we should encourage standards at all costs.

[fedora-arm] Daily Koji Compare Stats

2012-11-28 Thread jon . chiappetta
Wed Nov 28 09:05:01 EST 2012 f17-updates : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 2651 |0 | 268 |1

[fedora-arm] Undefined symbol in F18 build

2012-11-28 Thread Andrew Haley
$ emacs emacs: symbol lookup error: /lib/libEGL.so.1: undefined symbol: wl_registry_interface This seems to be due to Wayland being pulled in by something. I've attached the ld.so trace. Andrew. 6690: 6690: file=libgtk-3.so.0 [0]; needed by emacs [0] 6690:

Re: [fedora-arm] Undefined symbol in F18 build

2012-11-28 Thread Dan Horák
Andrew Haley píše v St 28. 11. 2012 v 17:31 +: $ emacs emacs: symbol lookup error: /lib/libEGL.so.1: undefined symbol: wl_registry_interface This seems to be due to Wayland being pulled in by something. I've attached the ld.so trace. I think is because old mesa build is in the

[fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting - 2012-11-28

2012-11-28 Thread Paul Whalen
Good day all, This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov 28th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work): PDT: 1pm MDT: 2pm CDT: 3pm EDT: 4pm UTC: 8pm BST: 9pm CST: 10pm Current items on the agenda:

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting - 2012-11-28

2012-11-28 Thread Peter Robinson
I'm not going to be able to make the meeting. This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov 28th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work): PDT: 1pm MDT: 2pm CDT: 3pm EDT: 4pm UTC: 8pm BST: 9pm

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting - 2012-11-28

2012-11-28 Thread Jon Masters
On 11/28/2012 02:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: 4) 3.7 Kernel and Device tree - support plan I've a build issue with rc7 that I'm been working with jonmasters on to resolve. Should have rc7 RSN. Yea. I'm on the hook for coming back about this before Friday. Hopefully in time for tomorrow.

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting - 2012-11-28

2012-11-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/28/2012 02:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: 4) 3.7 Kernel and Device tree - support plan I've a build issue with rc7 that I'm been working with jonmasters on to resolve. Should have rc7 RSN. Yea. I'm on the hook for

[fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting minutes 2012-11-28

2012-11-28 Thread Paul Whalen
Good day all, Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today. For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-11-28/fedora-meeting-1.2012-11-28-21.00.html Minutes (text):

Re: [fedora-arm] Regarding Seneca Issues

2012-11-28 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 11/28/2012 12:45 PM, Jon Chiappetta wrote: - repo issues (the generally perl based build failures due to repo issues). I reported I thought I had found the offending host but the issue appears to have come back. Was the host re-enabled, what testing has Seneca done? * Could you please

Re: [fedora-arm] Regarding Seneca Issues

2012-11-28 Thread Jon Masters
On 11/28/2012 09:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 11/28/2012 12:45 PM, Jon Chiappetta wrote: - repo issues (the generally perl based build failures due to repo issues). I reported I thought I had found the offending host but the issue appears to have come back. Was the host re-enabled, what

Re: [fedora-arm] Regarding Seneca Issues

2012-11-28 Thread Chris Tyler
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 23:17 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: Thing is, and not speaking for Brendan, but I'm sure he agrees. None of this is personal or meant to detract from the great work being done at Seneca. You guys have been great, and I know that sometimes we all get a bit frustrated, and even

[fedora-arm] precedence of built-in vs. platform trees?

2012-11-28 Thread Jon Masters
Hey guys, I apologize if I should have RTFM. If a platform provides a device tree at boot time, and the kernel also has a tree appended, what behavior is supposed to happen? i.e. what is the standard that is anticipated here? Jon. ___ arm mailing list