On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We're getting close to pushing a proper updates build for the F-18/17
releases to rebase them to kernel 3.8.x.
I have done a scratch build of 3.8.2-202 [1] and I would like some
wider testing especially on
Wed Mar 6 08:05:01 EST 2013
f19 : arm vs PA
Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote |
Missing |
--
10585 |0 | 679 |1 |
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:44:16 -0800
Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
Fedora 19 has many of the enablers for native aarch64 in core
packages such as glibc and gcc. Many more packages would compile if
config.guess and config.sub recognized aarch64 as a valid
architecture,
Good Afternoon all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, March 6th) at 4PM EST (9PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Aarch64 patching
3) Managing
On 03/06/2013 06:37 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I say we need the list of packages effected. then we can evaluate how
critical it is that we take action.
Here is the initial list:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~blc/fedora-arm/patchify/configure.pkgs
I think it may actually be much larger.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/06/2013 06:37 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I say we need the list of packages effected. then we can evaluate how
critical it is that we take action.
Here is the initial list:
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-03-06/fedora-meeting-1.2013-03-06-21.00.html
Minutes (text):
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:11 -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 03/06/2013 06:37 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I say we need the list of packages effected. then we can evaluate how
critical it is that we take action.
Here is the initial list:
