Broken deps for aarch64
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[ATpy]
ATpy-0.9.7-5.fc21.noarch requires python-astropy
python3-ATpy-0.9.7-5.fc21.noarch requires python3-astropy
[OpenLP]
Compose started at Wed Aug 13 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for aarch64
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[ATpy]
ATpy-0.9.7-5.fc21.noarch requires python-astropy
python3-ATpy-0.9.7-5.fc21.noarch
Hi All,
I outlined in more details the rational about the list below on a blog
post [1] but I figured I'd post the general list of devices here for
feedback and thoughts. Comments on the general direction are welcome
as well.
In a nutshell we have 200 odd deviices we can support in theory in
On 2014-08-13 10:36, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I outlined in more details the rational about the list below on a blog
post [1] but I figured I'd post the general list of devices here for
feedback and thoughts. Comments on the general direction are welcome
as well.
In a nutshell we have 200
Hi All,
I outlined in more details the rational about the list below on a blog
post [1] but I figured I'd post the general list of devices here for
feedback and thoughts. Comments on the general direction are welcome
as well.
In a nutshell we have 200 odd deviices we can support in theory
NACK. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127000 for details.
Peter
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
The commit d1c912c1001f was made into tegra_defconfig and later
forwared to multi_v7_deconfig as 0c86f089e66a93
Quoting original commit
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I outlined in more details the rational about the list below on a blog
post [1] but I figured I'd post the general list of devices here for
feedback and thoughts. Comments on the general direction are welcome
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort
I see listed the 3.17 kernel, though addins for the A20 is not needed by
me. But what concerns me, and I know it is out of control of this
group, is that my reading of this page is
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort
I see listed the 3.17 kernel, though addins for the A20 is not needed by me.
But what concerns me, and I
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
Yes, at the moment Fedora 21 GA is currently scheduled to be based on
3.16, as a result that is what we are planning on.
I see listed the 3.17 kernel,
On 08/13/2014 10:04 AM, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort
I see listed the 3.17 kernel, though addins for the A20 is not
Looks obvious to me. We all scratch our itches and share them to
kernel.org as patches. So you need working video today, it looks
like you need write a kms driver for the hardware.. ;)
I almost wish I had the expertise to do this.
I really don't need working video 'today'. It would be
On 08/13/2014 10:05 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
Yes, at the moment Fedora 21 GA is currently scheduled to be based on
3.16, as a result that is what we are
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort
I see listed the 3.17 kernel, though addins for the A20 is not needed by
me.
But what concerns me, and I know it is out of control of this group, is
that
my reading of this page is
On 14/08/14 00:47, Robert Nelson wrote:
armv7, min 1Gb memory, Sata support, under $100? Please tell me what other
devices I should consider? I have gleaned the few lists that I have
followed for discussion on devices. I have read the list of supported
devices for F21 and in most cases went
On 08/13/2014 10:47 AM, Robert Nelson wrote:
armv7, min 1Gb memory, Sata support, under $100? Please tell me what other
devices I should consider? I have gleaned the few lists that I have
followed for discussion on devices. I have read the list of supported
devices for F21 and in most cases
Thanks. I did look at these, and I like the people at Freescale; I work
with them in the IEEE. But you need the Wandboard quad to get Sata which is
the $129. I will have to think about it. Perhaps one for the one video
requiring application, as F22 is a lon time off.
If you consider
On 08/13/2014 11:00 AM, Adrian wrote:
On 14/08/14 00:47, Robert Nelson wrote:
armv7, min 1Gb memory, Sata support, under $100? Please tell me
what other
devices I should consider? I have gleaned the few lists that I have
followed for discussion on devices. I have read the list of
On 08/13/2014 11:10 AM, Robert Nelson wrote:
Thanks. I did look at these, and I like the people at Freescale; I work
with them in the IEEE. But you need the Wandboard quad to get Sata which is
the $129. I will have to think about it. Perhaps one for the one video
requiring application, as
armv7, min 1Gb memory, Sata support, under $100? Please tell me what
other
devices I should consider? I have gleaned the few lists that I have
followed for discussion on devices. I have read the list of supported
devices for F21 and in most cases went to the device site to see what it
Original Message
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] SunXI kernel 3.16 - Re: Device support for
Fedora 21
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 01:19:54 +1000
From: Adrian vk4...@bigpond.com
To: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
On 14/08/14 01:04, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On
On 08/13/2014 11:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
armv7, min 1Gb memory, Sata support, under $100? Please tell me what
other
devices I should consider? I have gleaned the few lists that I have
followed for discussion on devices. I have read the list of supported
devices for F21 and in most cases
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
Yes, at the moment Fedora 21 GA is currently scheduled to be based on
3.16, as a result that is what we are planning on.
So this means that anything
On 08/13/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
I see below you saying are based on the 3.16 kernel? From:
Yes, at the moment Fedora 21 GA is currently scheduled to be based on
3.16, as a result that is what we are
Hello,
I've compiled a kernel from:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi
I attached the .config to the mail in case is needed.
this config file i got it from:
https://github.com/cubieboard/cubie_configs/blob/master/kernel-configs/3.4/cubietruck_defconfig
This are the commands i used to
25 matches
Mail list logo
