[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

Hi, On 09/14/2016 02:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote: Hi Jeremy, all, (trimming) Perhaps Jeremy can update us on the status, and then he and others can help drive this forward (someone should nominate themselves as the ring leader too). I spoke with Cavium earlier today, and I know they'll be keen

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

Great - that was my preference just didn't want to overkill it. But this sounds like good test run of doing the process the right way... -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On Sep 14, 2016, at 17:13, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Jeremy, all, > > I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of > 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have > an official coordination effort between those

[fedora-arm] 48-bit support in F26?

Hi Jeremy, all, I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have an official coordination effort between those vendors/community members who are interested, to ensure that they help with the necessary

[fedora-arm] Re: F23 aarch64 support for HiKey and Dragonboard?

On 09/14/2016 01:00 PM, Ziqian SUN(zsun) wrote: > Sorry for reply on ancient mail. > I see that neither HiKey nor DragonBoard is marked in the wiki[1]. So I want > to know what's the support status of Hikey Board? > > And I see usually we ship ISO for aarch64, while Hikey and Dragon Board >

[fedora-arm] Re: F23 aarch64 support for HiKey and Dragonboard?

Sorry for reply on ancient mail. I see that neither HiKey nor DragonBoard is marked in the wiki[1]. So I want to know what's the support status of Hikey Board? And I see usually we ship ISO for aarch64, while Hikey and Dragon Board usually needs a img. So if supported, any hints on how I can