Hi Felix, Sorry for the late delay, some how this message hit my spam box.
> I managed to get Fedora 30 AARCH64 installed on a RPI 3B+ and it mostly runs > great but I'm hitting a couple issues that I'm just not sure where to start > looking. > > In order to make sure it's not the set of packages I'm installing, I brought > up a second RPI 3B+ that runs the official minimal image. I installed all the > same packages on the kicked system, that the minimal version has, so I don't > have differences. What doe you mean by "official minimal image"? Do you mean Fedora or Rasbian? > 1. The NIC LED doesn't work after the installation. It works normally during > kickstart. Connectivity is not affected. NIC LED works fine with the official > image. > 2. I get these messages in dmesg on a kicked system that are not poping up on > the minimal image system: > ... > [ 0.000000] CPU features: detected: Kernel page table isolation (KPTI) > ... > [ 0.011655] arch_timer: WARNING: Invalid trigger for IRQ75, assuming level > low > [ 0.011658] arch_timer: WARNING: Please fix your firmware > ... > [ 1.887602] kvm [1]: Invalid trigger for vtimer IRQ76, assuming level low Most of those can be ignored. In part it might depend on the answer to the question above. > 3. Looks like the model that is being detected is different for both systems > (where does that come from? Does that have effects somewhere?): > Minimal image: > [ 0.000000] Machine model: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ > > Kickstart: > [ 0.000000] Machine model: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Plus Rev 1.3 That message comes from the DT if it's provided by the firmware, which would also explain some of the differences above. > 4. The kickstarted system has an additional CPU feature that the minimal > image system doesn't have (They should have the same CPU?) > [ 0.000000] CPU features: detected: Kernel page table isolation (KPTI) Is there a kernel version difference? > 5. There is a couple more differences like hci initialization and other > things. Isn't this part of the kernel support? And the kernel is the same on > both systems. What does "uname -a" report? I suspect the difference here is the use of the firmware provided DT vs kernel provided. Do you have a symlink if you do a "ls -al /boot/dtb/" in both systems? > Is there documentation around the generation of the RPI image? I replicated > the kickstart file that can be found under /root on the minimal image but > that alone didn't help above issues. Maybe there is something special about > the environment this image is generated in? > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
