On 07/25/2012 04:33 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 12:54 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 09:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Steve,
Just a heads up that all the patches are now in Fedora 18 and shortly
>>
On 07/25/2012 12:54 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 09:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>> Just a heads up that all the patches are now in Fedora 18 and shortly
>>> there will be a mass rebuild of the entire distr
On 07/18/2012 09:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Steve,
>>
>> Just a heads up that all the patches are now in Fedora 18 and shortly
>> there will be a mass rebuild of the entire distro as part of F-18 to
>> have the distro completely
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>Steve,
>
>Just a heads up that all the patches are now in Fedora 18 and shortly
>there will be a mass rebuild of the entire distro as part of F-18 to
>have the distro completely rebuilt against the linker changes (amongst
>other thing
Steve,
Just a heads up that all the patches are now in Fedora 18 and shortly
there will be a mass rebuild of the entire distro as part of F-18 to
have the distro completely rebuilt against the linker changes (amongst
other things that the mass rebuild is being done for).
Regards,
Peter
On Fri, J
On 06/08/2012 07:24 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I think the thing you're missing here when comparing the Fedora
> release to Ububtu 12.04 is that Fedora isn't a long term release the
> next release will be in 6 months which is similar time frames to most
> of the other hardfp releases. If it's ope
On 06/08/2012 12:51 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've seen the log from [1] and I'm disappointed, to say the least. We
> made an agreement about this several weeks ago [2] in a conference
> call. Various of the people on the call claimed to be Red Hat / Fedora
> ARM and toolchain folks who were bot
Hi,
On 06/09/2012 12:24 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
*Every* major distro working on ARM has implemented what was agreed by
all of us in the conf call. Except Fedora. At this point, the message
*seems* to be that Fedora developers just do not care about working
with the rest of t
Hi Steve,
>>> *Every* major distro working on ARM has implemented what was agreed by
>>> all of us in the conf call. Except Fedora. At this point, the message
>>> *seems* to be that Fedora developers just do not care about working
>>> with the rest of the community, and that's a real shame. Please
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:45:42PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>Hi Steve,
Hi Peter,
>> *Every* major distro working on ARM has implemented what was agreed by
>> all of us in the conf call. Except Fedora. At this point, the message
>> *seems* to be that Fedora developers just do not care about wo
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:01:02AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>On 06/08/2012 09:51 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>understandable and reasonable. However, those patches have been
>>upstream for several weeks now and it seems nobody has cared enough to
>>pull them into Fedora yet.
>
>Steve,
>
>We pul
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Steve McIntyre
wrote:
> I've seen the log from [1] and I'm disappointed, to say the least. We
> made an agreement about this several weeks ago [2] in a conference
> call. Various of the people on the call claimed to be Red Hat / Fedora
> ARM and toolchain
On 06/08/2012 09:51 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Since then, distros have done the work necessary to use the linker
path that was agreed, making changes in gcc and glibc packages. Some
people went with the initial patches that were proposed for the sake
of urgency, e.g. Ubuntu built using these init
I've seen the log from [1] and I'm disappointed, to say the least. We
made an agreement about this several weeks ago [2] in a conference
call. Various of the people on the call claimed to be Red Hat / Fedora
ARM and toolchain folks who were both interested in working out a
reasonable answer to the
14 matches
Mail list logo
