Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-31 Thread Andrew Haley
On 05/31/2012 01:50 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: There's one addition I would like to see to the final release criteria: Updated linker path in gcc and glibc. Why is that important? We'll drop a compat symlink in anyway, and no-one should notice the change. Andrew.

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-31 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:49:57AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 05/31/2012 01:50 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: There's one addition I would like to see to the final release criteria: Updated linker path in gcc and glibc. Why is that important? We'll drop a compat symlink in anyway, and no-one

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-31 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 05/31/2012 09:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: * the compat symlink on its own isn't enough, changing the filename means the soname has changed too. Oh, yuck. I don't remember anyone thinking about that during the meeting. :-(

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 30 May 2012 14:52:20 -0400 (EDT) Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com escribió: Good day all, As many of you are aware we are not holding the Fedora ARM meeting this

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-31 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 05/31/2012 01:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: 2 reasons: * it would be nice if people using Fedora create binaries using the right path for the future * the compat symlink on its own isn't enough, changing the filename means the soname has changed too. There's a (quick and very

[fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-30 Thread Paul Whalen
Good day all, As many of you are aware we are not holding the Fedora ARM meeting this week, but shall return to our regular time next Wednesday June 6th. Congratulations to the primary architectures for their GA release of Fedora 17 on May 29th. With the successful release of the Fedora 17

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote: We have built 96% of F17, with approximately 85 packages missing and 188 missing builds (this including many packages that have 1 or more builds in

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-30 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 30 May 2012 17:00:58 -0400 Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com escribió: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote: We have built 96% of F17, with approximately 85 packages missing and 188 missing builds (this

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-30 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 30 May 2012 14:52:20 -0400 (EDT) Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com escribió: Good day all, As many of you are aware we are not holding the Fedora ARM meeting this week, but shall return to our regular time next Wednesday June 6th.

Re: [fedora-arm] Discussion - F17 GA release for ARM

2012-05-30 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 05/30/2012 11:52 AM, Paul Whalen wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Quality_Assurance/Final_Release_Criteria Let's begin the discussion on the list - What do you foresee blocking us from our final release of F17? There's one addition I would like to see to the final