On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:41 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
> >
> > Cool!
> >
> > What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
On 11/04/2011 03:41 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>> http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
>>
>> Cool!
>>
>> What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
>>
>> A few packages
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 12:00 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Always provide declarations of long double math functions when !_LIBC
> >
> > appears to fix the problem glibc-arm-mathdefs.patch tries to work
> > around. It is a simple patch which easily backports to 2.14.7.
>
> Yes, the "correct" fi
> Always provide declarations of long double math functions when !_LIBC
>
> appears to fix the problem glibc-arm-mathdefs.patch tries to work
> around. It is a simple patch which easily backports to 2.14.7.
Yes, the "correct" fix for glibc-arm-mathdefs is not the patch I
originally put in, b
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
>
> Cool!
>
> What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
>
> A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning:
>
.
On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
Cool!
What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning:
gcc: There are patches in the armv7hl build that affect volatile
bitfields a
> >> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
> >
> > Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
>
> yes please
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:52 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > We can host on Australia -- send me an ssh public key for access.
>
> Will do. What sort of information do we want this new chart to convey?
I think we need to see if the package sets are congruent, so a display
of the differences between
On 10/25/2011 11:52 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> We can host on Australia -- send me an ssh public key for access.
>
> Will do. What sort of information do we want this new chart to convey?
Packages only in armv7hl build (latest version)
Packages only in armv5tel build (latest version)
Changes only
> We can host on Australia -- send me an ssh public key for access.
Will do. What sort of information do we want this new chart to convey?
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:41 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Ideally, crontab'd!
>
> Heh. The trick is finding a machine that has both access to the repos
> *and* access to a web server, and is powerful enough to run the script
> in a reasonable time.
>
> But I'll see what I can do ;-)
We can host
> >> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
> >
> > Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
>
> yes please
Is there a suitable rsync target we can use to get a local copy of the
appropriate files?
Note: the answer to that partly depends on what kinds of comparisons
you're intereste
> Ideally, crontab'd!
Heh. The trick is finding a machine that has both access to the repos
*and* access to a web server, and is powerful enough to run the script
in a reasonable time.
But I'll see what I can do ;-)
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedo
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 13:53 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
>
> Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
Ideally, crontab'd!
-Chris
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:53 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
>
> Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
yes please
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
> - compare the armv5tel and armv7hl package sets again
Do we need another pretty chart? ;-)
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
So Moji has burned through all of the armv5tel builds at least once[0];
we have 4092 successful builds and 915 error builds at this point. Jon
and Paul are pulling in some lovingly hand-crafted builds done on the
weekend (thanks tinker915 and Henrick) and working through the error'd
builds -- any h
17 matches
Mail list logo
