Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-14 Thread Sean Omalley
...@rocketmail.com Cc: Jon Chiappetta jon.chiappe...@senecacollege.ca; arm arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 5:50 AM Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Sean Omalley wrote: It is all good. I didn't expect it to be perfect by any

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-14 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Sean Omalley omalle...@rocketmail.com wrote: Although I got a nice ascii train picture flying by the screen... so Im not sure im not hacked.. Is that the steam locomotive that drives by if you type sl instead of ls (and have the sl package installed), by

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-13 Thread M A Young
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Sean Omalley wrote: It is all good. I didn't expect it to be perfect by any means. :) I may have missed it. But how are you building these? I need the dev tools, at least enough to rebuild the kernel. ( I need to hardwire my wireless keyboard driver. It makes it less

[fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-12 Thread Sean Omalley
I tried the armv6 ([v6] http://142.204.133.82/tmp/v6/rpfr-10255.img.gz ) image on a new 512 pi. I tried to install the gui.. :)  It looks like it mostly worked. It just hangs on X. The filesystem is there and resized, the kernel boots, etc. I am getting: [    18.919] (EE) FBDEV(0): FBIOBLANK:

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-12 Thread Sean Omalley
From: Sean Omalley omalle...@rocketmail.com To: arm@lists.fedoraproject.org arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:53 AM Subject: [fedora-arm]  Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image I tried the armv6 ([v6] http://142.204.133.82/tmp/v6/rpfr-10255.img.gz ) image on a new

[fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-12 Thread Jon Chiappetta
I think I should have mentioned that firstly, I am missing a huge number of packages because I manually unrolled the yum groups and also you have to startxfce4 manually by switching to another terminal once booted. I hope to get to another compose which helps to fix these issues. Sorry about

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-12 Thread Sean Omalley
, 2012 6:28 PM Subject: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image I think I should have mentioned that firstly, I am missing a huge number of packages because I manually unrolled the yum groups and also you have to startxfce4 manually by switching to another terminal once booted. I hope

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-11 Thread M A Young
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 12/10/2012 10:31 AM, Jon Chiappetta wrote: I realize that these numbers seem very minor but I did notice a much faster drawing performance when firstboot was started compared to the v5 version of Fedora. Also, it takes away any excuses or doubt

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-10 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 12/10/2012 10:31 AM, Jon Chiappetta wrote: I realize that these numbers seem very minor but I did notice a much faster drawing performance when firstboot was started compared to the v5 version of Fedora. Also, it takes away any excuses or doubt that we're slower than raspian because we're not

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-09 Thread David Rusling
You might want to get some comments from Michael Hope on these numbers. The other using Thumb 2, right? Dave On Dec 8, 2012 8:39 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Brendan Conoboy wrote: If you could run a few benchmarks between the v6 and v5 spins we'd all be

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-09 Thread M A Young
I am not sure how much difference it makes but I have noticed that the kernel used by the v6 image is still armv5tel (everything else is armv6hl) so there might be a bit more performance gain possible. Michael Young ___ arm mailing list

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote: I am not sure how much difference it makes but I have noticed that the kernel used by the v6 image is still armv5tel (everything else is armv6hl) so there might be a bit more performance gain possible. The kernel makes no

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-09 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 12/08/2012 08:38 PM, M A Young wrote: On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Brendan Conoboy wrote: If you could run a few benchmarks between the v6 and v5 spins we'd all be *very* interested to know the difference in performance. Even simple stuff like time to bzip2 a cached file would be informative. Here

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:38 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Brendan Conoboy wrote: If you could run a few benchmarks between the v6 and v5 spins we'd all be *very* interested to know the difference in performance. Even simple stuff like time to bzip2 a cached

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 17 v6hl First Compose Image

2012-12-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:20:20 + Jon Chiappetta jon.chiappe...@senecacollege.ca wrote: Hey everyone, I was finally able to create an initial image for the rasp pi v6hl. It's by no means ready but I'm trying to release early and release often so I'm sending this out now. I was wondering if