[fedora-arm] Re: F38 on RPi4-8G

2023-04-28 Thread Randy DuCharme
Greetings, Just an update: I've been running a (slightly) customize 6.3.0.y kernel from the RPi linux repo and while it's still a wee bit sluggish (compared to F-37), chronyd keeps perfect time and the CPU core's enter into "WAIT" a *whole* lot less than before. Planning a source refresh and

[fedora-arm] Re: F38 on RPi4-8G

2023-04-26 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 4/25/23 16:40, Randy DuCharme wrote: Am I the only one having difficulties with this?  It's worse than half as fast as f37 was, NTP/Chrony refuses to work. I could go on. Afraid I'm going to have to ditch this.  Kernel's been building for 7 hours now.  Clocking, over-clocking,

[fedora-arm] Re: F38 on RPi4-8G

2023-04-25 Thread Randy DuCharme
Stuff like this in Kernel code is "dubious" at best! ( I won't engage in the, "it's just a warning argument") In function ‘btrfs_show_u64’,     inlined from ‘btrfs_space_info_show_bytes_reserved’ at fs/btrfs/sysfs.c:871:1: fs/btrfs/sysfs.c:637:13: warning: array subscript -44 is outside array

[fedora-arm] Re: F38 on RPi4-8G

2023-04-25 Thread Sally A. haj
I've upgraded from F37 with no issue, I am using RPi4 as a PC. My RPi4 overclocked to 2000. On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 22:44 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:40 PM Randy DuCharme > wrote: > > > > Am I the only one having difficulties with this?  It's worse than > > half > >

[fedora-arm] Re: F38 on RPi4-8G

2023-04-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:40 PM Randy DuCharme wrote: > > Am I the only one having difficulties with this? It's worse than half > as fast as f37 was, NTP/Chrony refuses to work. I could go on. > Afraid I'm going to have to ditch this. Kernel's been building for 7 > hours now. Clocking,