[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 17:27 schrieb Peter Boy : > > > >> Am 03.04.2023 um 17:05 schrieb Tom Callaway : >> >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/uboot-tools/2023.04/0.4.rc5.fc38/noarch/uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38.noarch.rpm > Works fine now on pine64 RockPro64 and Radxa

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 17:05 schrieb Tom Callaway : > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/uboot-tools/2023.04/0.4.rc5.fc38/noarch/uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38.noarch.rpm Got it. Thanks a lot! One day, I hope to be familiar with the subtleties as well. -- Peter Boy

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 14:39 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:01 PM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 03.04.2023 um 10:10 schrieb Peter Boy : >>> That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38,

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:01 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 03.04.2023 um 10:10 schrieb Peter Boy : > > > >> That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need > >> to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, > > Do yo have a direct link to the rpm? Sorry, for some reason

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 10:10 schrieb Peter Boy : > >> That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need >> to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, Do yo have a direct link to the rpm? Sorry, for some reason all my searches and links end up with the uboot-tools rpm

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 10:18 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 03.04.2023 um 09:53 schrieb Peter Robinson : >>> > Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are > only needed for advanced use.

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 03.04.2023 um 09:53 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > > >>> Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are > >>> only needed for advanced use. > >> > >> > >> OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 09:53 schrieb Peter Robinson : > >>> Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are >>> only needed for advanced use. >> >> >> OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched 2023-03-31 / u-boot >> 2023.04-rc4) I still get the message >>> Hit

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Robinson
> > Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are > > only needed for advanced use. > > > OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched 2023-03-31 / u-boot > 2023.04-rc4) I still get the message > > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > > ## Error: "distro_bootcmd" not

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 03.04.2023 um 00:35 schrieb Peter Robinson : >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine.

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 03.04.2023 um 00:35 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: > >> > >> Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine. > >> > >> > >> With F38 beta 1 & branched 20230326 it starts: > >> > >>

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-03 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 03.04.2023 um 00:35 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine. >> >> >> With F38 beta 1 & branched 20230326 it starts: >> >> ... >> >> Sorry to be so late with testing. Would be nice to get it

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-02 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 31 March 2023 at 18:28, Adam Sher wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if it will help, but I had a lot of problems booting Fedora on > the PineBook Pro that were solved by switching to tow-boot instead of > u-boot. RockPro64 is on their list of supported devices. > >

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-04-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine. > > > With F38 beta 1 & branched 20230326 it starts: > > U-Boot 2023.04-rc2 (Feb 17 2023) > SoC: Rockchip rk 3399 > Reset cause: POR > Model: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.1 > ... > Core: 394 devices, 33

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Adam Sher
Peter, Makes total sense. Good luck! On 3/31/23 2:37 PM, Peter Boy wrote: Hi Adam Am 31.03.2023 um 18:28 schrieb Adam Sher : Hi, I'm not sure if it will help, but I had a lot of problems booting Fedora on the PineBook Pro that were solved by switching to tow-boot instead of u-boot.

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Peter Boy
Hi Adam > Am 31.03.2023 um 18:28 schrieb Adam Sher : > > Hi, > > I'm not sure if it will help, but I had a lot of problems booting Fedora on > the PineBook Pro that were solved by switching to tow-boot instead of u-boot. > RockPro64 is on their list of supported devices. > >

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 31.03.2023 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 4:44 PM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 29.03.2023 um 19:42 schrieb Dennis Gilmore : >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:38 PM Peter Robinson >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 6:18 PM Peter

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 4:44 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 29.03.2023 um 19:42 schrieb Dennis Gilmore : > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:38 PM Peter Robinson > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 6:18 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > > Just another question: How do I get the

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Adam Sher
Hi, I'm not sure if it will help, but I had a lot of problems booting Fedora on the PineBook Pro that were solved by switching to tow-boot instead of u-boot. RockPro64 is on their list of supported devices. https://tow-boot.org/devices/index.html - Adam On 3/31/23 11:44 AM, Peter Boy

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 29.03.2023 um 19:42 schrieb Dennis Gilmore : > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:38 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 6:18 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Just another question: How do I get the Fedora spi image onto the device? > > As I found on the internet, the

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:53 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 19:42, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [...] > > I can confirm that this works just fine. I have 2 RockPro64's running > > Fedora 37 here and using u-boot on SPI from there. It reminds me I should > >

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:04 PM Gregory Carter wrote: > > Have you tried any HAT's with those systems? I am looking to move away from > PI as it is giving me supply chain issues and would like to settle on > something a bit more plentiful and not made in China. Pine64, and most things

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-30 Thread Gregory Carter
Have you tried any HAT's with those systems? I am looking to move away from PI as it is giving me supply chain issues and would like to settle on something a bit more plentiful and not made in China. On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 1:53 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote:

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-30 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 19:42, Dennis Gilmore wrote: [...] > I can confirm that this works just fine. I have 2 RockPro64's running > Fedora 37 here and using u-boot on SPI from there. It reminds me I should > document how I built a Fedora based NAS with 10 drives using a RockPro64. > It is

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-29 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:38 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > " > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 6:18 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 28.03.2023 um 14:09 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > > > > > Yes, it's a known problem, it will be fixed with the U-Boot rc5 build > > > which should be done later

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-29 Thread Peter Robinson
" On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 6:18 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 28.03.2023 um 14:09 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > > > Yes, it's a known problem, it will be fixed with the U-Boot rc5 build > > which should be done later today. > > > thanks for the info. I just checked, today’s built 20230329 is

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-29 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 28.03.2023 um 14:09 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > Yes, it's a known problem, it will be fixed with the U-Boot rc5 build > which should be done later today. thanks for the info. I just checked, today’s built 20230329 is rc4. looking forward. Just another question: How do I get the

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed

2023-03-28 Thread Peter Robinson
Yes, it's a known problem, it will be fixed with the U-Boot rc5 build which should be done later today. Peter On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine. > > > With F38 beta 1 & branched 20230326 it starts: > > U-Boot 2023.04-rc2 (Feb