Re: [fedora-arm] Regarding Seneca Issues

2012-11-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Jon Chiappetta jon.chiappe...@senecacollege.ca wrote: 6) Your topic here Koji: There have been a number of issues over the last couple of weeks that have been bought up and I haven't seen any form of update from Seneca as to the state: - DB perf tuning, it

Re: [fedora-arm] Regarding Seneca Issues

2012-11-28 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 11/28/2012 12:45 PM, Jon Chiappetta wrote: - repo issues (the generally perl based build failures due to repo issues). I reported I thought I had found the offending host but the issue appears to have come back. Was the host re-enabled, what testing has Seneca done? * Could you please

Re: [fedora-arm] Regarding Seneca Issues

2012-11-28 Thread Jon Masters
On 11/28/2012 09:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 11/28/2012 12:45 PM, Jon Chiappetta wrote: - repo issues (the generally perl based build failures due to repo issues). I reported I thought I had found the offending host but the issue appears to have come back. Was the host re-enabled, what

Re: [fedora-arm] Regarding Seneca Issues

2012-11-28 Thread Chris Tyler
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 23:17 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: Thing is, and not speaking for Brendan, but I'm sure he agrees. None of this is personal or meant to detract from the great work being done at Seneca. You guys have been great, and I know that sometimes we all get a bit frustrated, and even