On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
El Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:25:56 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us escribió:
When we were testing build were happening really fast, once we loaded
up the build jobs things have become really slow
El Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:55:09 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us escribió:
El Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:25:56 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us escribió:
When we were testing build were happening really fast, once we
loaded up the build jobs things have become really slow
Just to make sure we're not needlessly suffering, on my fileserver at
least (raid5) I found it to be MUCH faster if I increase the raid
stripe cache:
# boost the raid5 cache size, default is 256
for i in /sys/block/md*/md/stripe_cache_size
do
echo 4096 $i
done
This doesn't help with simple
I think its not possible to add more ram into arm machines.
the ram are soldered onboard.
I was referring to the file server, not the build hosts.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
El Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:43:15 -0800
Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com escribió:
On 12/25/2011 09:06 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Why not just mount direct via NFS? It'd be a lot quicker, not to
mention easier to tune. It'd work for building all but a handful of
packages (e.g. zsh), but you could
On 12/26/2011 06:43 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 12/25/2011 09:06 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Why not just mount direct via NFS? It'd be a lot quicker, not to mention
easier to tune. It'd work for building all but a handful of packages
(e.g. zsh), but you could handle that by having a single
On 12/26/2011 02:51 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:43:15 -0800
Brendan Conoboyb...@redhat.com escribió:
On 12/25/2011 09:06 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Why not just mount direct via NFS? It'd be a lot quicker, not to
mention easier to tune. It'd work for building all but a
El Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:39:55 +
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net escribió:
On 12/26/2011 02:51 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:43:15 -0800
Brendan Conoboyb...@redhat.com escribió:
On 12/25/2011 09:06 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Why not just mount direct via NFS? It'd be a
On 12/26/2011 07:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Why not just mount direct via NFS? It'd be a lot quicker, not to
mention easier to tune. It'd work for building all but a handful
of packages (e.g. zsh), but you could handle that by having a
single builder that uses a normal fs that has a policy
On 12/25/2011 05:25 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
When we were testing build were happening really fast, once we loaded
up the build jobs things have become really slow
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=238672 started
at 1:19 utc and at 5:18 utc four hours later the
On 12/25/2011 03:47 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 12/25/2011 06:16 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Allocating builders to individual rather than a single raid volume will
help dramatically.
Care to explain why?
Sure, see below.
Is this a proper SAN or just another Linux box with some disks in it?
On 12/26/2011 03:57 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 12/25/2011 03:47 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 12/25/2011 06:16 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Allocating builders to individual rather than a single raid volume will
help dramatically.
Care to explain why?
Sure, see below.
Is this a proper SAN
On 12/25/2011 09:06 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Why not just mount direct via NFS? It'd be a lot quicker, not to mention
easier to tune. It'd work for building all but a handful of packages
(e.g. zsh), but you could handle that by having a single builder that
uses a normal fs that has a policy
When we were testing build were happening really fast, once we loaded
up the build jobs things have become really slow
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=238672 started
at 1:19 utc and at 5:18 utc four hours later the buildrequires are
still being installed. australia is
On 12/24/2011 09:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Just throwing out what im seeing. lets see what ideas we can come up
with. performance is better than before. and seneca has done a great
job and put a lot of hard work into the reorg and im thankful for that.
We just have another bottleneck to
15 matches
Mail list logo
