On 02/27/2012 10:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hey all,
Id like to propose that we setup the heavybuilders to only be the
trimslices. just because the local sata disk on the usb bus is faster
than the shared scratch storage. packages build quicker on the
trimslices since there is much less sonte
El Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:03:01 -0500
M Abed escribió:
> Does that mean that we will remove the following machines from the
> heavybuilder channel or leave those as is?
>
> cdot-panda-10-1-v7hl
> cdot-panda-10-4-v7hl
> cdot-panda-10-5
> cdot-panda-11-4-v7hl
> cdot-panda-12-3
> cdot-panda-5-3
> cdot-
Does that mean that we will remove the following machines from the
heavybuilder channel or leave those as is?
cdot-panda-10-1-v7hl
cdot-panda-10-4-v7hl
cdot-panda-10-5
cdot-panda-11-4-v7hl
cdot-panda-12-3
cdot-panda-5-3
cdot-panda-5-4
Thanks
Masihul Max Abed
Seneca CDOT
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012
On 02/27/2012 02:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[snip]
I wanted to get others thoughs before i went and made the change
Just to be clear, these two systems are the same machines:
hsv-trimslice-9-v5telN N0.0/2.0 arm -
hsv-trimslice-9-v7hl Y N2.0/2.0 armhfp
Hey all,
Id like to propose that we setup the heavybuilders to only be the
trimslices. just because the local sata disk on the usb bus is faster
than the shared scratch storage. packages build quicker on the
trimslices since there is much less sontention to the storage and we do
have enough of th
