[fedora-arm] Re: Heads-up: Planning to have LXQt spin images on aarch64 since Fedora 38

2022-10-14 Thread Zamir SUN
On 10/14/22 20:40, Peter Robinson wrote: Just a heads-up, since aarch64 is more and more easily available in laptop and workstation form, I'm planning to request for generating LXQt images for aarch64. In order to unify the workflow, I've filed a self-contained change[1] and also the

[fedora-arm] Heads-up: Planning to have LXQt spin images on aarch64 since Fedora 38

2022-10-14 Thread Zamir SUN
Hi, Just a heads-up, since aarch64 is more and more easily available in laptop and workstation form, I'm planning to request for generating LXQt images for aarch64. In order to unify the workflow, I've filed a self-contained change[1] and also the corresponding ticket to rel-eng[2]. If there

[fedora-arm] Re: Heads-up: Planning to have LXQt spin images on aarch64 since Fedora 38

2022-10-14 Thread Peter Robinson
> Just a heads-up, since aarch64 is more and more easily available in > laptop and workstation form, I'm planning to request for generating LXQt > images for aarch64. In order to unify the workflow, I've filed a > self-contained change[1] and also the corresponding ticket to > rel-eng[2]. If there

[fedora-arm] Re: NanoPC-t4 does not boot with branch 20221008

2022-10-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 6:14 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > Peter, > > Can you try adding modprobe.blacklist=phy_rockchip_inno_usb2 to the > kernel command line and see if that works for you? So I'm pretty sure this is now fixed with kernel 5.19.15-301.fc37 or 5.19.15-201.fc36 so if you could give