On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 01:02 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7-srpms.html
I added a new shade of purple for the .0.armN case to indicate the
difference between we added an arm-specific patch (12) and we
tor 2011-10-13 klockan 15:57 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström:
tor 2011-10-13 klockan 02:25 -0400 skrev Jon Masters:
Henrik, what do you think? Do we have enough of these packages under
control that a VFAD is overkill? Or is there benefit in having one? I
would love to get to next week with
Been a rather intense discussion regarding U-Boot on IRC today, and time
for some reflections and a little decision to be taken.
In stage3 we do have an u-boot package which provides uboot images for
pandaboard, trimslice, beagleboard and some more. The pandaboard
requires u-boot on the boot
Should Fedora for ARM officially support for some well known boards?
I think it's important to have some easy-to-use installer for a few
popular (and easy to support) ARM platforms.
The rest of the questions are harder to answer ;-)
___
arm mailing
Hey everyone,
If you are participating with moji for the F15v5.0 build, there are some things
you should verify first. One requirement for the new glibc.arm0 is the
availability of extended attributes on the local file systems. One can test
this by running the following commands:
# yum
On 10/13/2011 12:22 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
Should Fedora for ARM officially support for some well known boards?
I would like to see Fedora ARM installable on popular ARM boards by
conventional installation mechanisms (IE, anaconda) without any
additional steps necessary.
Do you think
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 21:22 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
Been a rather intense discussion regarding U-Boot on IRC today, and time
for some reflections and a little decision to be taken.
Well, maybe ;)
In stage3 we do have an u-boot package which provides uboot images for
pandaboard,
On 10/13/2011 02:32 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
Thanks for asking it. I thought we'd already pretty much decided to
support TrimSlice and PandaBoard/BeagleBoard for example.
That's certainly what we've done with the kernel so far.
Let me precede the following by saying I don't think anybody is
Hi all,
I was revisiting a bug on ARM where systemtap cannot probe kernel modules
(http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13022). The linker is setting
the sh_addr field for some of the sections. The values for the sh_addr fields
look rather odd. I saw this both with fedora ARM fc13
El jue, 13-10-2011 a las 23:56 +0200, Henrik Nordström escribió:
tor 2011-10-13 klockan 17:32 -0400 skrev Jon Masters:
The question is not about supporting u-boot, it's about supporting
u-boot build for board X. So the package (if indeed it is a package)
would be for MLO (x-loader) and
10 matches
Mail list logo
