Re: [fedora-arm] Automatic AArch64 bootstrap daily update for August 5, 2013

W dniu 05.08.2013 14:11, Brendan Conoboy pisze: Naive Top 10 dependency issues 232 nodejs-devel Consider blocking it on AArch64 - iirc V8 is still not yet ported to this architecture. ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [fedora-arm] Is it possible to boot Samsung Chromebook from USB 3 external hard disk?

W dniu 08.08.2013 15:11, Richard W.M. Jones pisze: I can't find any documentation that says that the Chromebook definitively cannot boot from USB 3.0 or from external HDDs. (Also it doesn't work when the same disk is plugged into the USB 2 port). Once you enable USB and SD boot (crossystem

Re: [fedora-arm] Is it possible to boot Samsung Chromebook from USB 3 external hard disk?

W dniu 25.08.2013 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones pisze: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: But you can boot kernel from eMMC with rootfs on USB 3.0 hard drive. The hard drive doesn't boot, even when on the USB 2 port. Please define doesn't boot. It seems

[fedora-arm] AArch64: /usr/lib/ != /usr/lib64 (LUA)

I looked at list of failed builds and tried building awesome. Why it fails? [builder@model-1]$ grep lfs /tmp/log openat(AT_FDCWD, ./lfs.lua, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) openat(AT_FDCWD, /usr/share/lua/5.1/lfs.lua, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

Re: [fedora-arm] Automatic AArch64 bootstrap daily update for September 12, 2013

W dniu 12.09.2013 17:55, Mark Salter pisze: On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 08:10 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Newly attempted builds that failed: ncbi-blast+-2.2.28-1.fc19 Needs updated config.{guess,sub} In progress... pocl-0.8-7.fc19 configure: error: unknown/unsupported host

Re: [fedora-arm] Automatic AArch64 bootstrap daily update for September 12, 2013

W dniu 13.09.2013 20:11, Brendan Conoboy pisze: On 09/13/2013 08:03 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: pocl-0.8-7.fc19 configure: error: unknown/unsupported host aarch64-redhat-linux-gnu Needs llvm with AArch64 support. Isn't that already available? We have llvm-3.3-0.6 in stage4. I looked

Re: [fedora-arm] Automatic AArch64 bootstrap daily update for September 17, 2013

W dniu 17.09.2013 14:06, Brendan Conoboy pisze: Build failures after dependency resolution: 506 failed-build-rpms See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-build-rpms for complete list. Newly attempted builds that failed: xvattr fails due to lack of pod2man - it is fixed in

Re: [fedora-arm] Any opinions on ODROID-XU ?

W dniu 05.10.2013 19:27, Arun Thomas pisze: On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com mailto:jdisn...@gmail.com wrote: I decided to avoid this one, and instead wait for the next Chromebook with 5420. Has anyone tried to wire up serial to the current Chromebook?

[fedora-arm] Merging AArch64 patches into Fedora

Hi As I have a bunch of patches to merge into Fedora I made a wiki page [1] listing all source packages I have made some patches for. But as they were mostly made against F19 I have to go through them and check are they still needed/working. If some of them are considered high priority then

Re: [fedora-arm] Merging AArch64 patches into Fedora

W dniu 04.12.2013 23:24, Peter Robinson pisze: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote: Hi As I have a bunch of patches to merge into Fedora I made a wiki page [1] listing all source packages I have made some patches for. But as they were mostly made

Re: [fedora-arm] still do not have sata root fs bootable on wandboard quad

W dniu 08.12.2013 13:07, Tim Fletcher pisze: Apologies I meant rootdelay=seconds (I use this on a machine with a rather slow CF card as a rootfs) rootdelay iirc is deprecated and replaced by valueless rootwait argument. ___ arm mailing list

Re: [fedora-arm] FOSDEM ?

W dniu 27.12.2013 04:42, Daniel Veillard pisze: I was wondering if we planned something specific in term of presence at FOSDEM (Brussel 12 Feb) for Fedora ARM ? I will be at FOSDEM/Brussels from Friday morning to Monday evening. No extra plans for Sunday evening/Monday.

Re: [fedora-arm] Cheap board comparison

W dniu 11.02.2014 15:58, Gordan Bobic pisze: Well, one of my long time dream is to have an arm based hacker laptop that I have printed (CNC whatever) and designed, and can use with my beloved Fedora - of course when upgrade comes, simply I replace the complete board - and I have new system.

Re: [fedora-arm] Wiki gardening for aarch64

W dniu 18.02.2014 01:15, Brendan Conoboy pisze: Hi everybody, Adam Williamson mentioned to me that the Fedora wiki was missing an entry for Aarch64 on the secondary architecture list. I've gone ahead and updated the architecture page:

Re: [fedora-arm] ARM serial numbers

W dniu 29.03.2014 20:38, Steve Underwood pisze: When I look at the /proc/cpuinfo file with Fedora 20 running on Panda and Beagle Bone Black boards the revision and serial number lines just show zeros. I think the devices on these boards have serial numbers encoded in them, and they should

Re: [fedora-arm] Flash Player for Arm

W dniu 04.04.2014 22:23, Jim pisze: Is there a FlashPlayer in Arm to use in Firefox ? iirc no. If you like to play with random binaries you can get ChromeOS version running with Chrome/Chromium. ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [fedora-arm] not able to clone rootfs for aarch64

W dniu 19.08.2014 o 14:43, Pradeep Kiruvale pisze: Hi All, I am trying to clone the root file system for aarch64 from the below link but git clone not working. Please let me know how can I get rootfs. http://fedorapeople.org/groups/armv8/rootfs.git nfs-root I took this link from wiki

Re: [fedora-arm] Each boot on my Cubietruck, and different MACaddr

W dniu 09.09.2014 o 04:51, Robert Moskowitz pisze: Read Hans de Goede's post on the F19 and the Allwinner (Cubie) back on 12/26/2013. He supposedly uses the SID for a consistant local scope MACaddr. I Do get that on my Cubieboard2, but not on my Cubietruck. Hans also told that there was a

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 21 Alpha RC1 for aarch64

W dniu 10.10.2014 o 13:19, Peter Robinson pisze: Hi All, The first Release Candidate for Fedora 21 Alpha for Aarch64 is now available. There are Server iso and network install images for the aarch64 (arm64) platform as part of the Fedora Server WG. Cloud and Workstation trees are not

Re: [fedora-arm] A 64 bit ARMv8 Android tablet arrives ...

W dniu 17.10.2014 o 09:56, Richard W.M. Jones pisze: On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 08:39:03AM +0100, Andrew Wafaa wrote: The Non-US version of the Samsung Glaxy Note4 is powered by the Exynos7, which is an Octa Core A57/A53 in big.LITTLE config. Note4 with Qualcomm cpu is not US only device. So if

[fedora-arm] Wiki cleanup for AArch64

Hi AArch64 has small amount of pages in wiki but they are a mess. The /Architectures/AArch64 [1] is an entry one but then /Architectures/ARM/AArch64 [2] looked like entry page as well. I got hit by that today and moved bootstrap info from [2] to /Architectures/ARM/AArch64/Bootstrap [3]... If

Re: [fedora-arm] Wiki cleanup for AArch64

W dniu 06.11.2014 o 14:31, Paul Whalen pisze: AArch64 has small amount of pages in wiki but they are a mess. The /Architectures/AArch64 [1] is an entry one but then /Architectures/ARM/AArch64 [2] looked like entry page as well. I created [1] as a new landing page to remove 'ARM', also

Re: [fedora-arm] u-boot 2014.10 GA on it's way to F-21

W dniu 13.11.2014 o 15:14, Adam Goode pisze: Works great for me! Thanks. Does anyone have a beaglebone white? I'm still worried that this fix will break that board. I did not followed thread but have working BBW somewhere. can you point me to SD card image which I can use to test?

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 5 (RC5) for ARM aarch64 Available Now!

W dniu 04.12.2014 o 03:34, Peter Robinson pisze: Don't worry you're not seeing things... We're keeping numbers in sync with mainline and they went from RC2 - RC4 in quick stead and decided RC5 was needed. This should be close to mainline RC5 with all the same package fixes pulled into the

[fedora-arm] No virtualisation in Fedora 21 on Mustang

In case you do not know yet: there is no virtualisation support in Fedora 21 on APM Mustang. Looks like one of 3.18-rc commits went into 3.17/stable tree and disabled it for us. Added into to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165290 [root@pinkiepie virt]# LC_ALL=C virsh create

Re: [fedora-arm] No virtualisation in Fedora 21 on Mustang

W dniu 05.12.2014 o 06:05, Paul Whalen pisze: Fixed in kernel-3.17.4-302.fc21, which has been built on primary but not yet for aarch64. For testing a scratch build can be found here: http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2816858 [0.352299] kvm [1]: GICV size 0x2000 not

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 6 (RC6) for ARM aarch64 Available Now!

W dniu 10.12.2014 o 12:51, Peter Robinson pisze: Release Candidate 6 is out. Updates include: - shim fixes - installer fixes Please test! 13:15 hrw@pinkiepie-rawhide:isos$ dumpet -i Fedora-Server-DVD-aarch64-21-RC6.iso Fedora-Server-DVD-aarch64-21-RC6.iso does not contain an El Torito

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2015-02-03

W dniu 04.02.2015 o 12:53, Peter Robinson pisze: * Fedora kernel needs usb support for mustang (pwhalen, 15:43:49) Upstream kernel needs usb support for Mustang CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PLATFORM=y CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD_PLATFORM=y CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_PLATFORM=y Those options need to be enabled for a

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2015-02-03

W dniu 04.02.2015 o 13:50, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze: W dniu 04.02.2015 o 12:53, Peter Robinson pisze: * Fedora kernel needs usb support for mustang (pwhalen, 15:43:49) Upstream kernel needs usb support for Mustang CONFIG_USB_XHCI_PLATFORM=y CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD_PLATFORM=y

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 19 aarch64 builds

W dniu 11.02.2015 o 16:31, Karanbir Singh pisze: Rumour has it that there were fedora19 tree's that worked for the APM Mustang boards. Where can I find this ? Or is fedora21 the only aarch64 build published ? In past we had many different images provided as there was no installation support

Re: [fedora-arm] Downgrade to F21?

W dniu 05.04.2015 o 05:06, Robert Brown pisze: Hi Seems I need rpmfusion for most of what I am trying to do. Is there a downgrade process to go to F21 from F22 Rawhide (device is Mk802II) and retain the current kernel version (3.19.0-0.rc7.git3.1.fc22.armv7hl) and u-boot (from RH version

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 23 for aarch64 is here!

W dniu 10.11.2015 o 15:57, Clive Messer pisze: On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 09:17 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Basically the Raspberry Pi organisation has no urge to be a good citizen in the open source community I cannot believe you said that! At least put some context into that sentence. They

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 23 for aarch64 is here!

W dniu 10.11.2015 o 05:23, Clive Messer pisze: On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 17:20 -0600, Troy Dawson wrote: So ... your point is? My point? That Fedora is bootable out-of-the-box on the hardware that ordinary (non-commercial) users are actually buying and using. PS. Fedora might support a lot

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 23 for aarch64 is here!

W dniu 10.11.2015 o 09:45, Bob Goodwin pisze: On 11/10/15 03:35, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: "On ARM it means raspberry/pi boards I don't understand this? What is the problem with the latest RPI-2b? No support in mainline kernel? ___ arm ma

[fedora-arm] Re: 32 bit ARM guest on aarch64 host

W dniu 27.02.2016 o 14:33, Richard W.M. Jones pisze: I've been trying to get a 32 bit Fedora/armv7hl guest to boot on a 64 bit Fedora/aarch64 host. Host: Fedora Rawhide, aarch64 on Mustang Guest: Fedora 22 disk image from: $ virt-builder --arch armv7l fedora-22 I used virt-manager for

[fedora-arm] Re: Raspberry Pi 3

W dniu 01.03.2016 o 09:03, Fernando Cassia pisze: I just dont understand why they insist on having everything onboard (specially wireless) when usb dongles for wifi and BT can be had for a couple of dollars. Much more interesting, IMHO would be the addition of a SATA port AND USB 3.0. They

[fedora-arm] Re: How to rebuild a single dtb file

W dniu 15.03.2016 o 02:19, Andrew Gillis pisze: I want to rebuild a dtb file so I can test it with some hardware changes I made to an imx6 board. I could just rebuild the kernel but that takes forever. Is there an easy procedure for just rebuilding a single dtb files? I tried using dtc but it

[fedora-arm] Re: armv7: qemu & grub2 & efi ...

W dniu 22.07.2016 o 12:28, Gerd Hoffmann pisze: Booting armv7 machines is pretty messy, and fedora seems to support uboot only for them. There isn't a armv7 build of grub2 ... I've updated the edk2 package to also build arm firmware images (edk2-arm subpackage), which should land in

[fedora-arm] Re: Qemu aarch64 install

W dniu 16.02.2017 o 18:59, Gerd Hoffmann pisze: > I think it would be more useful to offer a 4k kernel in addition to > the 64k one, similar to how Fedora ships kernel with and without > lpae support on armv7. Some applications still check PAGE_SIZE only during compilation instead of on runtime.

[fedora-arm] Re: Kraxel's Kernel and VC4

W dniu 20.10.2016 o 19:38, Aly Dharshi pisze: > I have successfully installed Fedora 24 with onto a RPI3 with Kraxel's > kit. [..] > Would anybody have any thoughts on solving this issue. I know it may not > be completely a Fedora problem especially since its not a Fedora team > built kernel.

[fedora-arm] Re: Missing bcm2835-gpiomem kernel module in Fedora 25

On 27 November 2016 at 14:55, wrote: > Hello! > > I use Fedora 25 on my Raspberry Pi 3. I would like to use DHT22 driver > from Adafruit but there is no /dev/gpiomem device in Fedora 25. It seems > that bcm2835-gpiomem kernel module is missing. > > Many drivers and libraries

[fedora-arm] Re: KVM on Raspi3

W dniu 15.05.2017 o 17:22, Jon Masters pisze: > Hi, > > I haven't looked into this, but the following merge for 4.12 got flagged > for followup: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg149582.html > > Others might find this interesting. I guess it boots at EL2 these days > then - haven't played

[fedora-arm] Re: Ceph (last release) on aarch64

W dniu 21.02.2019 o 21:31, Pierre-Francois RENARD pisze: > I am trying to build a ceph cluster based on 4 raspberry3B+. > Following the official CEPH documentation is a dead end as packages > are only available for readhat/centos and not fedora ! I tried to > used the el7 repository but the are

[fedora-arm] Re: GPT partition on Fedora ARM images

W dniu 03.05.2019 o 21:28, Andrew Gillis pisze: > I want to install Fedora ARM on a 400GB SD card for use with imx6. The > current images are have DOS partitions so they won't work on an SD that > large. GPT is mandatory once you pass 2TB. Before it MBR is just fine.

[fedora-arm] Re: State of RocPro64 support?

W dniu 13.05.2020 o 11:21, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze: > Some time ago I bought Rockpro64 board from Pine64. To check how EBBR > works, how PCIe works on SBCs, Mali Panfrost driver etc. > > Board arrived yesterday. I connected serial cable (CB2102 dongles suxx, > FT2232HL works

[fedora-arm] Re: Any update on suggested devices?

W dniu 10.11.2020 o 17:28, Matthew Miller pisze: Rather than people emailing me at random, which is easy for me to drop, can the WG and/or SIG come up with a list of people? I'm thinking something like a dozen people and 1-3 devices each depending on commitment level. I have RockPro64 and APM

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 Rockpro64 Invalid bus 0 (err=-19)

W dniu 16.02.2021 o 18:50, Aaron Siegel pisze: Marcin Thank for your response and your blog on installing Fedora on a Rockpro64. Your blog has been very helpful. Thanks. I am using the latest uboot that packaged with uboot-images-arm8, 2020.10. Are there issues with this versions? Which

[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 Rockpro64 Invalid bus 0 (err=-19)

W dniu 13.02.2021 o 18:03, ad...@siegel-tech.net pisze: I am trying to update the SPI on a Pine64 Rockpro64. I have flashed the SPI with ayufan's uboot, Debian starts. Now I want to flash the SPI with Fedora's uboot. Here are the steps to load the Fedora uboot on the SPI:   - I made the

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora on Pinebook Pro

W dniu 06.10.2021 o 17:25, Andreas Reschke pisze: I've tried the same (LUKS disk encryption) with actual Fedora 35 Beta and Fedora 34 with up2date 5.14.9-200.fc34.aarch64. Same behavior: not really useful. I can see the prompt for password but only via serial console password was accepted.

[fedora-arm] My AArch64 SoC features table

Recently I started one project: AArch64 SoC features table The goal is to collect /proc/cpuinfo dumps from misc AArch64 systems and generate table showing which cpu core features are supported in which SoCs. Handy if you want to play with SVE, SME or other feature you read about in Arm