On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 01:02 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7-srpms.html
I added a new shade of purple for the .0.armN case to indicate the
difference between we added an arm-specific patch (12) and we
tor 2011-10-13 klockan 15:57 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordström:
tor 2011-10-13 klockan 02:25 -0400 skrev Jon Masters:
Henrik, what do you think? Do we have enough of these packages under
control that a VFAD is overkill? Or is there benefit in having one? I
would love to get to next week with
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7-srpms.html
I added a new shade of purple for the .0.armN case to indicate the
difference between we added an arm-specific patch (12) and we just
changed the spec files (91).
The ones that have patches are:
anaconda-15.31-1.fc15.0.arm1.src.rpm
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7-srpms.html
I added a new shade of purple for the .0.armN case to indicate the
difference between we added an arm-specific patch (12) and we just
changed the spec files (91).
DJ, I would like to
