I would highly recommend avoiding any logos, without proper historical
reference. One of the problems with traditional Linux icons, are that
they are very un-iconic. It's better to be textually based, in my
opinion, than to use disorienting imagery. At this point, most of the
clay has already set s
this all these efforts, got me to have a play around too. :)
i was started having a go at one idea of letters inserting into each
other kinda like a module.
I had put E and O in side the M. it then kinda looked like/spelled Meoo
like a cat.
So what about a darn cat logo? maybe a cat playing with
Parobalth writes:
...
> For example Debian uses a dual licensed logo with
> an "open use logo" and a restricted-use logo for use by the Debian
> Project and its members only.
... and I'd strongly recommend against doing the same.
The way that came about was that the original vote had the logos t
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Parobalth wrote:
> I love the ASCII art replies. It is almost like we are in the same
> room and can look at each others sketched ideas!
> I initially had an idea where the capital E of E
I love the ASCII art replies. It is almost like we are in the same
room and can look at each others sketched ideas!
I initially had an idea where the capital E of EOMA is made of circuit
board elements with small black chips in the empty spaces of the E.
I am going to work on this idea and combinat
