On 2017-09-27 15:42 +0100, Alexander Ross wrote:
> On 27/09/17 14:58, Christopher Havel wrote:
> > Typing on phone, please excuse top post.
> >
> > Lithium ion cells are somewhat sedate, but cannot release as much current
> > at once as lithium polymer cells can. Lithium iron phosphate cells are
On Sep 26, 2017, at 01:16, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Richard Wilbur
> wrote:
>> Then to taper up, we have two options:
>> 1. spread in both directions from the inner 2 pairs,
>> or
>> 2. spread to one side
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alexander Ross
wrote:
> On 27/09/17 10:05, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Alexander Ross
>>
Phone again, sorry again... 10% of battery height is your minimum space.
On Sep 27, 2017 10:42 AM, "Alexander Ross"
wrote:
> On 27/09/17 14:58, Christopher Havel wrote:
> > Typing on phone, please excuse top post.
> >
> > Lithium ion cells are somewhat sedate, but
On 27/09/17 14:58, Christopher Havel wrote:
> Typing on phone, please excuse top post.
>
> Lithium ion cells are somewhat sedate, but cannot release as much current
> at once as lithium polymer cells can. Lithium iron phosphate cells are
> similarly sedare, but have capacities and discharge
Typing on phone, please excuse top post.
Lithium ion cells are somewhat sedate, but cannot release as much current
at once as lithium polymer cells can. Lithium iron phosphate cells are
similarly sedare, but have capacities and discharge abilities more like
those of lithium polymer cells.
On 27/09/17 10:05, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Alexander Ross
> wrote:
>
>> [1] luke, the eoma68 laptop li-ion cell is a non typical right?
>
> that's incorrect. it's a lithium polymer battery. it's therefore
>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Alexander Ross
wrote:
> [1] luke, the eoma68 laptop li-ion cell is a non typical right?
that's incorrect. it's a lithium polymer battery. it's therefore
chemically stable.
l.
___
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:10 AM, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
>
>
> Quite; does this disable function fully and completely disable all attempts
> at using any ME functionality such that nothing can re-enable the ME, or is
> this disablement somehow impermanent or more limited in
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Bill Kontos wrote:
>
>> nothing in return" my purchase decision will not change. So far all
>> that
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
now, it *just so happens* that someone recently discovered that the
NSA has clearly had their fingers into intel processors... because
they requested a DISABLE function of the ME back-door co-processor.
without such a disable function there would be
11 matches
Mail list logo