Re: [Arm-netbook] Patent-Left

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:13:11AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Adam Van Ymeren wrote: > > > I think there's some misconceptions about what Luke is trying to prevent. > > looks like it. in the extreme case i am trying to prevent

Re: [Arm-netbook] Patent-Left

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Jean Flamelle wrote: >> devices, someone has to take action. >> > > That makes sense. > Recognizing standards organisations as a victim (of eroding public > trust), that motivates the organization to perform more of a watch-dog > service by

Re: [Arm-netbook] Patent-Left

On 2/24/18, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > it does, and it has. the cases that i've heard about have involved > Trademarks rather than Certification Marks: the same branch of law > applies. it's very simple: if someone creates a "clone" and the > *clone* kills someone or

Re: [Arm-netbook] Patent-Left

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Jean Flamelle wrote: > markets" release. Even if the standard is copyrighted that I doubt > using that as a protection against a copy-cat of a "similar" standard

Re: [Arm-netbook] Patent-Left

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Adam Van Ymeren wrote: > I think there's some misconceptions about what Luke is trying to prevent. looks like it. in the extreme case i am trying to prevent people being murdered. this is not an exaggeration. i don't understand why people don't

Re: [Arm-netbook] Patent-Left

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Jean Flamelle wrote: > Disclaimer: this is a brainstorm of ideas on what is practical. I am a appreciated. > economic support to be had for anyone involved. It