Re: [Arm-netbook] Another processor with RISC-V and it's not looking OSHW

On 2/13/19, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > now you know why i started libre-riscv. > > l. Beautiful : ) -- CC0 ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large

Re: [Arm-netbook] Just a thought for the 2nd revision of your standard,

Actually, just a small edit, you are right, regardless, because both have 1 usb slot. You are probably better off regardless using the RK3308 or the RK3326 Whichever is better, I am totally in for the idea. I hope you will finally deliver to your, backers. I want to see this succeed. :) On

Re: [Arm-netbook] Just a thought for the 2nd revision of your standard,

hi zap, minor correction: the EOMA68 *standard* will *not* require (or undergo) revision in order to support any given processor. On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:34 PM zap wrote: > https://linux-sunxi.org/A64 > > > sunxi cedrus now supports this processor. ah that's good. > I would be estatic to

[Arm-netbook] Just a thought for the 2nd revision of your standard,

https://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort https://linux-sunxi.org/A64 sunxi cedrus now supports this processor. I would be estatic to see that happen. A64 is a good processor because it is 64 bit, and 32 bit has less people interested in it more and more as time passes... What do you