Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i'm pinging mike to find out where he's at. will let you know.
I appreciate the update Luke, thanks.
As a friendly reminder: please let us know what we can do to help both with technical
issues, time on some work that differently technical people can help
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
Again, to reiterate, because I am still seeing evidence of
"complaints" out there, from people who believe this should be easy:
Thanks, as always, for the updates. If we can somehow help, please do let
us know.
I do not envy you having to deal with the per
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
*sigh* and tim cook bless him is talking about privacy... it's as if
noone listens to him, even inside apple itself...
I think I may have missed a sarcastic note there: Do you actually believe
that Tim Cook cares about Apple user's privacy? It's like reading
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
now, it *just so happens* that someone recently discovered that the
NSA has clearly had their fingers into intel processors... because
they requested a DISABLE function of the ME back-door co-processor.
without such a disable function there would be absolu
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
indeed. it may sound strange but when there is no other option (and
by that i mean *exhaustive* analysis finds no other option) i do not
mind "crossing the line" into what would traditionally be viewed by
software libre purists as "unacceptable territory" *IF
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
You can install an entirely free system with no non-free components.
You can also install Debian without taking account of any recommends.
But the recommends and suggests fields are still listing nonfree software,
which was the FSF's issue. Not accepting the suggestio
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
they're doing the best that they believe they can do, but they _have_
been told. see joey hess's very public description of the Debian
Charter as a "toxic document".
I've seen https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/11/msg00174.html where
Hess makes this
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i can't work out how to do page-moves... did you manage the
PassThrough one as well?
If you're referring to
http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA68/Passthrough
then yes that was handled too.
If that's not the URL you're referring to pl
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i know, i'm going through them. feel free to help if you like.
I just moved a bunch of pages as I went around correcting "EOMA-68" to
"EOMA68" (except in one instance which mentioned the misspelling on
http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architect
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i know, i'm going through them. feel free to help if you like.
No problem; I'm happy to help after my wiki login is approved.
___
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp.co
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
ok so i've written here in favour of that idea:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/EOMA-68#EOMA-68
Is the page at http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA-68
authoritative?
If so, perhaps this page should be re
11 matches
Mail list logo
