Re: [Arm-netbook] What's new at the end of 2023?

2023-11-13 Thread Mike Henry
Just wanted to add that I am still excited about this project. I don’t understand how anyone can contribute without access to the hardware. Is there some extra sitting around that I could get ahold of (at my expense) to test and help out? On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 14:25 Richard Wilbur wrote: > On

Re: [Arm-netbook] NLnet PET Grant 1st round selection approved, 2nd round to begin soon

2019-02-20 Thread Mike Henry
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 12:02:34PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > i've received word that we've passed the 1st round selection criteria > > for a EUR $50,000 Grant from the NLnet foundation. they have EUR > > $5.6m available however they must have well over a hundred other > >

Re: [Arm-netbook] slashdot submission help needed on IIT Madras RV64 SoC

2018-07-30 Thread Mike Henry
looks like the post has been flagged as spam ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk

Re: [Arm-netbook] EOMA68-A20 Prototype Status

2018-06-04 Thread Mike Henry
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:56 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > wrote: >> fuckers sold the fucking DDR3x8 RAM ICs after we specifically asked >> them to hold it, they wouldn't accept a deposit, and said that they >> would hold stock whilst we tested samples. >> >> fucking 3rd party sales

Re: [Arm-netbook] Early UART output vs. housing board discovery

2018-01-16 Thread Mike Henry
>> (Unfortunately this won't be as easy as "sed" and "git commit", because >> the EOMA68 standard isn't maintained in Git :/.) > > i knw, it was a decision a long time ago, to keep the standard on > an independent third party "open" site. pain in the neck not having > it in git. still, a