Re: [Arm-netbook] OT: Food for thought

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 14:35:48 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:28 AM wrote: > > > You know what happens when you can't answer one of my questions, > > right? :) tap tap tap tap .. tap tap tap ... Aha! > > How's this, a 28/22nm chip fabrication plant for

Re: [Arm-netbook] OT: Food for thought

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 07:47:07 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 3:49 AM David Niklas wrote: > > > > It looks like there are some quantum interferences as well as EM > > > and RF issues, *and* probably some power and

Re: [Arm-netbook] microkernels

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 03:05:45 + Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:12 AM Christopher Havel > wrote: > > > So, as I (poorly) understand it, the idea of a "microkernel" is that > > each process/thread/application

Re: [Arm-netbook] Reframing The Holy War

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 22:38:32 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > In fact, demanding and ensuring complete control over the technologies > > we use is a pragmatic and entirely justified strategy for anyone who > > cares about their data, their computing

Re: [Arm-netbook] tricky conundrum for the upcoming libre-riscv soc crowdsupply page: image needed

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 07:02:04 + Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:46 AM David Niklas wrote: > > > > not attached: i think i know why, i haven't added image/svg to the > > > allowed content filters for this list. > > > > Now it is attached as a gzip. > >

Re: [Arm-netbook] OT: Librem 5?

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 02:10:56 -0500 "J.B. Nicholson" wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > now, it *just so happens* that someone recently discovered that the > > NSA has clearly had their fingers into intel processors... because > > they requested a DISABLE

Re: [Arm-netbook] Conflict-free minerals

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:15:26 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > thus sadly they no longer have the right to distribute the FP2. or > future products. if they continue to do so they will be operating as > an illegal criminal cartel (an Organised Crime Syndicate) *not* a

Re: [Arm-netbook] python coding help needed (sin, cosine, blah blah)

On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 06:58:54 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:24 PM, wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 05:43:48 -0400 > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >> > >> https://math.stackexchange.com/ (bla) > >>

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:10:21 +0200 Pablo Rath wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 06:19:29PM -0400, David Niklas wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 13:21:56 +0200 > > > > Actually, my PC has a kernel fault > > It took me a moment to guess that you abbreviate PocketChip as "PC".

Re: [Arm-netbook] Standards Organization as a Potentially Universal Free/Libre Software Developement Sustenance Model

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:47:48 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:01 PM, John Luke Gibson > wrote: > >> "well everyone does it so we don't need to take > >> special note of it" is how, historically, utterly valuable knowledge >

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Tue, 30 May 2017 18:41:19 +0200 fuumind wrote: > On Tue, 30 May 2017 12:10:33 -0400 > Christopher Havel wrote: > > As for me, I'd > > rather live in the here and now than dwell on what might happen --but > > can't be known for sure-- in the

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

On Tue, 30 May 2017 03:27:19 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:37 PM, David Niklas wrote: > > > Prior to purchasing the Pocket CHIP I read their docs and kickstarter > > page. See this (their kickstarter page says similar): > >

Re: [Arm-netbook] mali gpu reverse engineering lkcl may ignore

On Mon, 22 May 2017 12:05:28 +0200 "mike.v...@gmail.com" wrote: > 2017-05-22 0:06 GMT+02:00 : > > > Because I deleted a previously email about this subject, I start a new > > email. > > Info. Lkcl said, he is not in favor of reverse engineering a

Re: [Arm-netbook] Existential 3D Printing Moments

On Fri, 19 May 2017 01:42:52 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Neil Jansen > wrote: > now, neil, this is the kind of speed at which an arduino 2560 *cannot > cope*, and, also, where the design flaws inherent in

Re: [Arm-netbook] libre 64-bit risc-v SoC

I apologize for DOS'ing the list, I can only get online about once a week. On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:54:43 +0200 Hannes Schnaitter wrote: > Hi, > > I've done some research into this in the last couple of weeks. > > Am Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:21:00 +0300 > schrieb Bill Kontos

Re: [Arm-netbook] libre 64-bit risc-v SoC

I apologize for DOS'ing the list, I can only get online about once a week. On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:58:57 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, mike.v...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > If you're trying to trans-code

[Arm-netbook] microdesktop v1.7 arrived, works fine... but...

On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 06:12:16 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > ok so the story goes like this: > > back in august 2016 i got the A20 card up and running with mainline > 4.7rc1 (or thereabouts), including patching in NAND support for a > proper mtd device. it worked...