Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:42 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> [I don’t know if any Guix hackers have received an A20 board for porting
>
> i donated one to the key developers when i encountered them at fosdem 2017.
Ah, great. I just chatted with that
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 03:38:59 +
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> it was quite hilarious to get up and running.
> https://wiki.parabola.nu/MIPS_Installation - oh. discontinued.
> that's not going to help *sigh*.
You also have an ARM installation guide[1], however in your case that's
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 3:46 AM David Niklas wrote:
> > the key one is, you have absolutely no idea if the host correctly
> > generated the autoconf settings correctly or not. even running under
> > qemu is not
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:49:57 +
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:39 AM Julie Marchant wrote:
>
> > And as for 32-bit MIPS... just outta luck, I guess, at least until an
> > FSF-approved distro starts supporting it.
Until recently, GuixSD supported MIPS
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 15:36:33 +
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> regarding cross-compiling: if you've seen how openembedded uses
> bitbake to do cross-compiling (which includes setting an automatic
> qemu redirect of autoconf script running and even qemu-emulated gcc
> running), you
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:42 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> [I don’t know if any Guix hackers have received an A20 board for porting
i donated one to the key developers when i encountered them at fosdem 2017.
l.
___
arm-netbook mailing list
Julie Marchant writes:
> That being said, it's the FSF's rules, so Parabola is the only real
> option regardless of what one might think of the FSF's classification.
The EOMA68-A20 is an armhf board, isn’t it? Since GuixSD is available
for armhf, porting it to this board should not be too
On Friday 7. December 2018 16.28.24 Wookey wrote:
> On 2018-12-07 15:24 +0100, Paul Boddie wrote:
> > Cross-building would be a workaround, but Debian appears fundamentally
> > opposed to that,
>
> Do you mean 'as buildds'?
I don't know. If that is the way the Debian archive is built then
On 2018-12-07 15:24 +0100, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Cross-building would be a workaround, but Debian appears fundamentally
> opposed
> to that,
Do you mean 'as buildds'? Debian's support from cross-building has
improved hugely over the last 8 years, and you can now crossbuild a
_lot_ of debian.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 1:11 PM Stefan Monnier wrote:
> There's also the fact that the wiki.debian.org includes several places
> where they encourage users to install `non-free` packages.
ohh. yeah. that won't help :) that would be viewed as "endorsement
of the installation of non-free
> Just a note, the only way to add the non-free section in Debian
> involves typing the word "non-free" into a particular spot on a text
> file, or if using the GUI interface, to edit the entry for the Debian
> repo to type "non-free" into the "Components" textbox in the "Edit
> Source" dialog
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:38:43PM -0500, Julie Marchant wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>> On 12/06/2018 01:39 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > the RYF Criteria are extremely specific: it's not enough to have a
> > non-free section that's "disabled", it
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:39 AM Julie Marchant wrote:
> And as for 32-bit MIPS... just outta luck, I guess, at least until an
> FSF-approved distro starts supporting it.
all 32-bit OSes are on the ropes, but not for the reason that most
people think. it's down to the linker phase of binutils
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/06/2018 01:39 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:58 PM Paul Boddie
> wrote:
>
>> Discussion can be had about the FSF criteria, of course, but
>> since Luke is actually seeking such endorsement, the only thing
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:58 PM Paul Boddie wrote:
> Discussion can be had about the FSF criteria, of course, but since Luke is
> actually seeking such endorsement, the only thing that might be helpful for
> him is to indicate to him that various FSF concerns are now addressed in the
> more
On Thursday 6. December 2018 09.58.51 Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> On 2018-12-05 at 17:40:29 +0100, Paul Boddie wrote:
> > Of course, Debian supports everything of interest, but then there has to
> > be a process of weeding out non-free packages and content.
>
> Note that this "process" simply
On 2018-12-05 at 17:40:29 +0100, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Of course, Debian supports everything of interest, but then there has to be a
> process of weeding out non-free packages and content.
Note that this "process" simply involves not adding the 'non-free'
repository to /etc/apt/sources.list. It's
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:41 PM Paul Boddie wrote:
> But if something is worth doing, even if not everyone agrees, why does anyone
> need some kind of "sign off" from someone they've heard of? Just do what you
> think is right or interesting or enjoyable or useful, already! I honestly
> don't
On Wednesday 5. December 2018 03.38.59 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> it was quite hilarious to get up and running.
> https://wiki.parabola.nu/MIPS_Installation - oh. discontinued.
> that's not going to help *sigh*.
Yes, it seems that people got enthusiastic when Stallman started
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:12 PM Paul Boddie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Nice to see the progress being made in the recent update:
>
> https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68/micro-desktop/updates/what-do-1-000-eoma68-a20-pcbs-look-like
>
> It's a shame that you have to redo your Parabola bootstrapping. I
20 matches
Mail list logo
