Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

Hi, If I may trespass on the discussion... The first rule of engineering (alright, make that "one of the many first rules of engineering") is "if it ain't broken, don't fix it". Right now, IMO and AFAICT, there have been no incidents related to the conduct of any participant in this project --

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> It hopefully will not ever matter. > > it will not ever matter. >> I fear taking away too much of your time >> when you have

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:29 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > We need not continue this discussion and could instead wait and see. no, i will not be waiting and seeing. there is

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/22/2016 01:39 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:53 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > wrote: > >> Yes, I consider it closed. I wanted a CoC to

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/20/2016 11:58 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:30 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > wrote: For example, Wikipedia has a hierarchy. It may not be perfect, but I doubt it would work without one. Anarchies don’t have

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Russell Hyer wrote: > Looks like http://www.divergent3d.com is the right URL (though > slightly off topic for EOMA68, still probably worth an investment, a >

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > no it is actually partially relevant because of the relation to 3D > printing. i've been tracking what kevin's up to and am

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:30 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > You administer this mailing list, not me. In this context, you are above > me in the hierarchy / organization, even if it

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

Looks like http://www.divergent3d.com is the right URL (though slightly off topic for EOMA68, still probably worth an investment, a portable car chassis! The video is pretty amazing) Russell On 20 September 2016 at 09:30, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/20/2016 09:36 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:19 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > wrote: >> I’m not talking about precise, high-level duties / implementation >> details but more generally about the complement to rights in the

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:19 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On 09/18/2016 11:05 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:25 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:01 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On 09/18/2016 03:37 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> words being what they are, it's a critical, critical

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:34 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On 09/17/2016 11:52 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:06 AM, pelzflorian (Florian

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/17/2016 11:52 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:06 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > wrote: >> It directly references skin color, religion etc. and >> the term SJW clearly is about these -isms. Sexism etc. are selective >> harm.

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > On 2016-09-17 at 09:05:00 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> correct. one of the things that i love about free

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:06 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On 09/17/2016 10:05 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:29 AM, pelzflorian (Florian

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 2016-09-17 at 09:05:00 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > correct. one of the things that i love about free software is that > most people are completely anonymous behind a wall of plain text. we > don't give a fuck about people's gender, or race, or age, or size, or > any other

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:29 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On 09/17/2016 04:08 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Sam Pablo Kuper >>

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/17/2016 04:08 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Sam Pablo Kuper > wrote: >> Does anyone else here think it would be, on balance, a good idea to >> adopt a Code of Conduct, perhaps based on the Contributor Covenant[0], >> for

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Sam Pablo Kuper wrote: > I am still new to this community, and am more of a lurker than a > contributor. > > Many of the projects I am interested in have a code