Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

John Luke Gibson writes: > On 5/9/17, Benson Mitchell wrote: >> Seems like you're confusing back-quote (`) with single-quote ('), maybe? >> > I just want to say that alone makes for pretty terrible design within > a fundamental

Re: [Arm-netbook] EOMA68 card based on NXP i.MX7 (work in progress)

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:02 AM, mike.v...@gmail.com wrote: > Looks like a good objective. The i.MX display pipeline is reasonably reverse > engineered to have a full open open source experience. > > Reading this list I guess you'll need a few things before you start: > 1.

Re: [Arm-netbook] eoma68 router (qca9531)

Hi, On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 03:04:37PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > so i would assume, because it's not an actual 10/100 ethernet, that it > > would run at (saturate) the full 480mb/sec of USB2. so not quite GbE > > speeds but pretty damn close. yay! > > Based on what USB2 gives us with

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

Free Software Foundation Latin America Linux-Libre. On 10 May 2017 09:40:02 GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >--- >crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > >On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:00 AM, John Luke Gibson

Re: [Arm-netbook] GR8 based EOMA68 card

On 05/10/2017 08:05 PM, Ismo Väänänen wrote: > Hello, > > The recent talk about de-blobbing R8 and thus also GR8 inspired me to > do a quick write up on how I see a Next Thing Co. GR8 > System-In-Package chip being used in an EOMA68 compatible card. > The latest version of the write up can be

[Arm-netbook] GR8 based EOMA68 card

Hello, The recent talk about de-blobbing R8 and thus also GR8 inspired me to do a quick write up on how I see a Next Thing Co. GR8 System-In-Package chip being used in an EOMA68 compatible card. The latest version of the write up can be found here:

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On 05/10/2017 06:48 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:29 PM, zap wrote: > >> I am curious though, how far have you gotten Luke with the a20 version, etc, > no change: waiting is waiting. send board off, wait for 2-4 weeks > for it to

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 07:38:22PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > awww! i quite _like_ the horrendous straying off-topic-ness :) > would you settle for asking people to start a new thread? Or at least change the subject line when the subject changes? -- hendrik

Re: [Arm-netbook] GR8 based EOMA68 card

Do it! The more cards the merrier. On 11 May 2017 03:05:24 GMT+03:00, "Ismo Väänänen" wrote: >Hello, > >The recent talk about de-blobbing R8 and thus also GR8 inspired me to >do a >quick write up on how I see a Next Thing Co. GR8 System-In-Package chip >being used in an

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 05:46:23PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > > I'm an atheist whose basic emotional attitude is anger against God for > > not existing. > > hendrik, i have to be honest: don't

Re: [Arm-netbook] GR8 based EOMA68 card

I had this same idea just today, though I doubt I would have gotten even this far. Go for it! I believe I originally brought it up, in the context of an EOMA50 card, but an EOMA68 card would probably be more immediately useful. ___ arm-netbook mailing

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > the next logical step in the chain was to analyse this emergent > evolutionary process "in general", and to conclude that the > intelligence is *NOT* a "birthright of humanity" as humans like to > arrogantly

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:23 PM, zap wrote: > it is sad because they think they will be rewarded at the end. But they > already have their temporary very short term reward. Though they deserve > it, I feel a mixture of pity and anger towards them. steady, zap: i

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:24 PM, zap wrote: > I am curious, should we refocus on some of the pressing issues? > > such as the rk3288 and the rk3399? hehehe. :) if i didn't have time i would leave these discussions alone... except if i thought they were important. i'm

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:29 PM, zap wrote: > I am curious though, how far have you gotten Luke with the a20 version, etc, no change: waiting is waiting. send board off, wait for 2-4 weeks for it to be done. nothing i can do in the meantime, absolutely nothing i can

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > now that i think about it, i believe i heard of something about 20 > years ago called the humanist society (or something like that). > apparently they live their lives according to a really quite [humane]

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 05:06:17PM -0700, Jeffrey Sites wrote: > > > > On May 9, 2017, at 16:00, John Luke Gibson wrote: > > > > Right now I'm looking at CHIP-buildroot. > > I'm planning on patching out any blobs and also anything not CHIP > > related (as we don't want a

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Pablo wrote: > With any non-Chip-kernel you will lose NAND support. > So you can either: > a)patch your libre kernel > or > b) ignore NAND and use flash memory via usb port. > > For b) you will need mainline U-Boot because NextThings U-Boot

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

> >>On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:00 AM, John Luke Gibson > >>eaterjo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Right now I'm looking at CHIP-buildroot. > >> I'm planning on patching out any blobs and also anything not CHIP > >> related (as we don't want a person to accidentally think the script > >> will give them

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

2017-05-10 16:38 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton : > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Pablo wrote: > > > With any non-Chip-kernel you will lose NAND support. > > So you can either: > > a)patch your libre kernel > > or > > b) ignore NAND and use flash

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > I'm an atheist whose basic emotional attitude is anger against God for > not existing. hendrik, i have to be honest: don't take it the wrong way ok, but i found this very very funny. windmills?? cheage!! :)

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On 05/09/2017 10:56 PM, Lyberta wrote: > zap: >> I don't know if your religious or not, > I'm agnostic and I have extreme anti-religion views: > https://lyberta.net/articles/social/anti_religion.html Hmm that is rare, at least for me to hear, So you don't know if he exists, but you hate the

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

Hello, > well, one of the things we don't unfortunately enforce properly is > good subject-line management, which would allow people to select the > topics that they're interested in. so, i'm going to try to start > doing that and would appreciate people doing the same. Could you also add

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Vincent Legoll wrote: > Hello, > >> well, one of the things we don't unfortunately enforce properly is >> good subject-line management, which would allow people

Re: [Arm-netbook] Laptop Power Input?

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Alexander Ross wrote: > Not sure what the power input for laptop is? 5V-17V although i may have to change that as i may need to put in a 5V power

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:00 AM, John Luke Gibson wrote: > Right now I'm looking at CHIP-buildroot. > I'm planning on patching out any blobs and also anything not CHIP > related (as we don't want

[Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Kyle wrote: > Damn. You know a list has been taken over by posting nazis when entire > threads get hijacked just to tell anyone who cares to listen that someone > top posted, and that breaks someone's flow. nooo: it means that we have new people

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On 09/05/17 20:55, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > nooo: it means that we have new people whom we need to accommodate > and teach them how to not disrupt communication with over 400 other > people. as we get new people, that discussion naturally needs to take > place regularly. Is there

Re: [Arm-netbook] I saw your recent update, Luke

2017-05-10 4:34 GMT+02:00 Kyle : > Damn. You know a list has been taken over by posting nazis when entire > threads get hijacked just to tell anyone who cares to listen that someone > top posted, and that breaks someone's flow. > I'm not seeing any of that. The inline posting is

Re: [Arm-netbook] firefly 3399 all source software disclosed?

Hi Luke On the topic of GPU's have you seen this? https://github.com/etnaviv/etna_viv Seems to be a libre driver for Vivante GPU's On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, wrote: > > > How

Re: [Arm-netbook] firefly 3399 all source software disclosed?

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Allan Mwenda wrote: > Hi Luke > On the topic of GPU's have you seen this? > https://github.com/etnaviv/etna_viv yeahyeah i have. > Seems to be a libre driver for Vivante GPU's it is. the problem with vivante is that their *own*

Re: [Arm-netbook] EOMA68 card based on NXP i.MX7 (work in progress)

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Vincent wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Since this is my first post on this list, please allow me to get off my > chest a few things: > > - huge thanks to Luke for getting this project started > - me = funding a PFY laptop, eagerly awaiting for it to

Re: [Arm-netbook] EOMA68 card based on NXP i.MX7 (work in progress)

2017-05-09 22:53 GMT+02:00 Vincent : > Hi everybody, > > Since this is my first post on this list, please allow me to get off my > chest a few things: > > - huge thanks to Luke for getting this project started > - me = funding a PFY laptop, eagerly awaiting for it to arrive ;-)

Re: [Arm-netbook] EOMA68 card based on NXP i.MX7 (work in progress)

Hardware designs and documentation are crucial for the lliberation of hardware. You wont be regarded well by the community if you hide these. Even if you a proprietary software to design (loss of YOUR personal freedoms) save all results in a format usable in a libre client (OUR freedom is at

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On 05/10/2017 03:13 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:02 PM, zap wrote: > >> To be honest, even atheists have a better chance of getting into heaven than >> those false teachers. > *cackle* :) > I thought someone would enjoy that sad

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On 05/10/2017 03:17 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Vincent Legoll > wrote: Could you also add something about staying on-topic, thanks.

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

On 05/10/2017 05:24 PM, zap wrote: > > On 05/10/2017 03:17 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> --- >> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 >> >> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Vincent Legoll >> wrote: > Could you also

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

>> Could you also add something about staying on-topic, thanks. > > awww! i quite _like_ the horrendous straying off-topic-ness :) OK, your call... > would you settle for asking people to start a new thread? Nope, I prefer when people follow the rules by themselves, I'm not doing ML-police.

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Bill Kontos wrote: > Exactly this. I always prefer to do something by choice. Being manipulated > is the one thing that I hate the most in life. But this takes time, and I > have come to a very similar conclusion to this society you are

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On 05/10/2017 02:23 PM, Bill Kontos wrote: > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > > wrote: > > > > now that i think about it, i believe i heard of something about 20 > years ago called the humanist society (or something

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:02 PM, zap wrote: > To be honest, even atheists have a better chance of getting into heaven than > those false teachers. *cackle* :) > Life is a challenge but hypocrisy is unneeded. it always makes me wonder, what do people get out of being

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Vincent Legoll wrote: >>> Could you also add something about staying on-topic, thanks. >> >> awww! i quite _like_ the horrendous straying off-topic-ness :) >