[Arm-netbook] Can someone explain me what this really means?

I find it hard to believe, but here is some upstream code from Qualcomm no less for the snapdragon 845 and the adreno 630 gpu too. https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-February/165668.html ___ arm-netbook mailing list

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Christopher Havel wrote: > I honestly don't know of a message archive, the specific message that i was referring to was only sent about 2 to 3 hours beforehand. you should be able to find it easily by re-reading only about 4 or 5 message

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:30:49PM -0500, Julie Marchant wrote: >> >> Either that, or perhaps you are referring to some other law which is >> neither copyright nor trademark, and spreading confusion by using two >> wrong terms. >

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

On 2018年02月14日 06:45, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > yes. my understanding is that Trademarks and Cerfitication > Marks, by being covered *by* Copyright Law, are in effect a sub-branch > of Copyright. No, copyright has nothing to do with them. Why do you think copyright has anything

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

On 2018年02月14日 11:27, Louis Pearson wrote: > It occurs to me that Luke is a citizen of the UK, and so may not be > using US law. Yes, but I see no reason to believe that the U.K. government would unreasonably intertwine these completely unrelated laws together in the way that Luke suggests. Of

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Philip Hands wrote: > IANAL, but I suspect that the confusion arises because Luke is > (presumably) the sole copyright holder on the canonical documentation > for the standard, so while there is a Certification Mark (which I think > is mostly

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Julie Marchant wrote: > On 2018年02月14日 06:45, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > yes. my understanding is that Trademarks and Cerfitication > > Marks, by being covered *by* Copyright Law, are in effect a sub-branch > > of Copyright.

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

Having reviewed the message in question (as near as I can determine... I believe it to be Ron's email, 11 Feb 2016 at 12:09pm) I still see no problems posed by what Ron is doing or saying. Luke, I notice that you have not directly responded to any of the ongoing commentary. I would invite you to

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

On 2/13/18, Julie Marchant wrote: > On 2018年02月13日 15:38, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> he's calling into question my authority and the right as a Copyright >> Holder of the word - and standard - "EOMA68", chris. that's very very >> serious. and also publicly

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

It is also important to note that for all intensive an diy project could receive a certification. Also if you read the first line of that wikipedia article: "Reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms, also known as fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, denote a voluntary

Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer

Quick post from phone, in my way to bed. Please excuse top-posting and occasional typos, if present. I have a proposal for Luke that I think would solve this problem instantly. Let there be two "levels" of EOMA68. "EOMA68" by itself can be construed from now on to mean "compatible with the