Hello,
For those building Fedora ARM packages on BeagleBoard-xM, you might like
to know that the recommended price just dropped to $149:
http://beagleboard.org/buy
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 12:03 -0400, omall...@msu.edu wrote:
Quoting Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net:
It'd have to be more finely grained than sub-architecture since a kernel
for one target won't necessarily work on other CPU of the same
sub-architecture (e.g. a Kirkwood kernel won't work on
Folks,
This might be of use to someone else trying to figure this out. I am
going to followup with a thread proposing some flags to consider for
building toolchains based around a minimum of VFP3 *AND* NEON (with some
emphasis on discussion about the latter), and Thumb2 interworking. But
for now,
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:23 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
*). ARM VFP3 hardware floating point (h)
*). ARM NEON Architecture
*). Thumb2 interworking
I don't think you have to anything explicit here. Thumb-2 and ARM
code interoperate just fine.
*). Your suggestion here?
*) Hard
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 22:36 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:46:06PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
I'd like to kick off a discussion about flags for ARMv7. My proposal
here is that we treat v7hl as an entirely different architecture, and
don't try any multi-arch kind
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 00:09 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Jon Masters wrote:
If you read how VFPv3 actually implements its registers, you'll see that
the extra 16 (for D32) really are totally separate anyway as far
Folks,
I am attending the Linaro Developer Summit next week. If anyone else is
attending, please do say hi! Also, if there are topics you think are of
interest to the Fedora ARM project that I might or might not have
already thought about, let me know if I can do anything useful :)
I'll send a
Sending on behalf of Christian Reis (kiko):
Hello there,
Starting next Tuesday, May 31st, Linaro tech leads will be running a
set of public phone calls to present official plans for our engineering
units. Calls are daily at 15:00 UTC, and there are local dial-in numbers
for most countries
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
All other parts of fedora's release engineering take in kickstarts and spit
out the output. I think that for going forward we should look at using
appliance-creator which is part of the appliance-tools package to create the
root
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:25 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
sooo... although the situation *right now* is that nobody in the
commercial world is the slightest bit interested in LSB because they
all do custom builds of complete software stacks, it could be said
that *if* the free
Hi Folks,
We're planning to have an activity day of sorts on this coming Friday,
the purpose of which is to sync up and co-ordinate the various efforts
to achieve working ARMv7 hardfloat support for Fedora 15 bringup. The
venue is #fedora-arm, and also using a dialin number (to be provided)
for
Folks,
I would like to see us have alternatives to the Debian xdeb-graph type
tools where we can visualize minimal dependencies for bootstrapping. I
believe there are several scripts floating around, and that styrene
might be able to provide some of what we're looking for...Jon?
Failing that,
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 09:54 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Jon Masters j...@redhat.com writes:
Folks,
I would like to see us have alternatives to the Debian xdeb-graph type
tools where we can visualize minimal dependencies for bootstrapping. I
believe there are several scripts floating
Forwarding
---BeginMessage---
I promised to write some notes on the addition and what to look at,
and then got swamped, then stuck in an email transition that caused
me to lose track of the message I was going to reply to - sorry!
I'm just sending this to lsb-discuss, I know some of the calls for
Folks,
I ran some quick scripts a PandaBoard with FC13 bits on it. Here's a
list of packages that don't have the standard fc13 dist tag naming:
archdist package
armv5tel12-4 glibc-2.12-4
armv5tel
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 16:40 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Jon Masters wrote:
Oh, it can all be done :) I'm just curious what exists already. Perhaps
Dennis can help fill in some gaps here. Also, I know of at least one
script already I've pinged someone else about.
umm
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 18:09 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
pass it a pile of packages, and it produces the needed
graphviz dot files, from which production of a .ps is trivial
I did this for some of the F13 packages and got quite a nice PDF. I
wanted to run this against all of the Seneca
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 23:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Folks,
I would like to see us have alternatives to the Debian xdeb-graph type
tools where we can visualize minimal dependencies for bootstrapping. I
believe
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 18:16 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 23:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
At the moment there isn't much but I know the Seneca are currently
working on a tool to do this. Maybe they can come and discuss it on
the list (hint hint!).
I mentioned
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 00:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 16:40 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Jon Masters wrote:
Oh, it can all be done :) I'm just curious what exists already
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 09:54 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
[0] We're making a one time incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to
the hard float ABI defined in section 6
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 22:35 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
The only item up for (some) discussion seems to be use of Thumb2. Builds
so far have been having problems when turning on T2. For various
reasons, I'm not particularly desperate to see us build with T2. A todo
of mine is to confirm
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 03:20 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 01:24 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 23:35 -0400, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
hello guys
any reason to not include fake-kernel into respository ?
http://hongkong.proximity.on.ca/yum
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 03:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Which gels with the ARM-state PLTs I've seen generated from builds (even
with Thumb2 enabled during build time). I still want to actually finish
testing Thumb2 build libraries used with a non-Thumb application, but I
think it's now
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:14 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
What do the kernel maintainers think about having a kernel subpackage
that just provides fake deps as part of the main kernel package?
Anyway. To get back to the point...there are some systems that cannot
run a stock Fedora kernel yet
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 14:15 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:14 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
What do the kernel maintainers think about having a kernel subpackage
that just provides fake deps as part of the main kernel package?
Anyway. To get back
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 14:59 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
I'll be posting the split out kernel-noarch spec this week, which should
rectify building kernel-doc and kernel-headers, without needing to go
through the half-hearted rigamarole to do it now.
Great! Also +1 to considering the fake deps
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:12 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
I want a Fedora-ARM t-shirt!
I want that, and a bumper sticker, and some laptop stickers. And a cup,
and a cafepress store with all of these available. Really want to help
make that happen, Chris.
Jon.
Hi Folks,
We are hosting a Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day today, at
14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is
to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating point).
You can find a lot more detail here, along with all the pre-reqs/bits:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:11 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
I missed on all the fun today, but I guess I still can bring in some useful
stuff.
Support for perl openssl gettext popt glib2 pkgconfig
git://knox.linuxhacker.ru/~green/arm.git armv7hl-green
Excellent. I'll take a look in a
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 04:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
We are hosting a Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day today, at
14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is
to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating point).
You can find a lot more
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 14:16 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:44 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:11 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
I missed on all the fun today, but I guess I still can bring in some
useful stuff.
Support for perl openssl
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 14:20 -0400, omall...@msu.edu wrote:
Another idea.. I can't -quite- make it fit, but..
Get
F RISC e
e v
d e
o r
r y
a o
n
e
A+ for imagination, but...
I think it's overly busy and complicated, plus the
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:28 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:45 PM, David A. Marlin dmar...@redhat.com wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
I want a Fedora-ARM t-shirt!
Anyone else interested in getting some made up? Any ideas on design?
(One idea that crossed my mind was a
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:11 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
I missed on all the fun today, but I guess I still can bring in some useful
stuff.
Support for perl openssl gettext popt glib2 pkgconfig
git://knox.linuxhacker.ru/~green/arm.git armv7hl-green
Good work by the way! I pulled it. Thanks
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 21:00 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
http://www.itworld.com/mobile-wireless/175829/arm-and-linux-major-construction-ahead
Well, Monday was a slow news day.
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 00:40 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Quick status update on F-14. Today I kicked off the mass build so
we've got forward movement now at a much quicker pace :-)
Excellent, thanks Peter!
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 00:36 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
We are hosting another Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day
today, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this
session is to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating
point). Going forward
Folks,
If anyone would like an up-to-date canned image for PandaBoard, please
visit the following location (and see the README.txt for instructions):
http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/boards/PandaBoard/images/f13/beta3/20110622-0/
This collection of image files uses David Marlin's
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 00:36 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
We are hosting another Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day
today, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this
session is to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating
point). Going forward
Hi Folks,
Roland: please see the following page for background:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap
Stefan was right that ar was broken in the F15 bootstrap. In fact what
happened was that the ar rebuilt by elfutils fails to recognize the
u option. It seems
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 19:30 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
For now, I suggest we switch to the binutils minimal ar that has been
working just fine and wait on Roland to get us any ideas.
I've temporarily committed a copy of the binutils ar into /usr/bin/ar
and left the rest of elfutils bits
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 17:55 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I just do a make install in the bootstrap script, which I thought
resulted in an ar binary getting installed (as opposed to eu-ar). It
seems Fedora confines the list of files installed to:
%{_bindir}/eu-addr2line
%{_bindir}/eu-ar
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 08:02 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 02:17 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
Join us on Friday to celebrate July with another in our series of VFADs!
Just a heads up that you won't have many Canadians joining you -- July 1
is Canada Day, a *big
Folks,
Thanks to the hard work of many people (including Stefan's contribution
this morning to get some of the final nss bits and RPM in place, and of
course the groundwork put in place by DJ Delorie), we are now very close
to having rpm and rpmbuild. I fixed a problem with digest support
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 05:15 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:47 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Thanks to the hard work of many people (including Stefan's contribution
this morning to get some of the final nss bits and RPM in place, and of
course the groundwork put in place
Folks,
I've uploaded the first package I've built using the rootfs:
http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/armv7hl/
(follow the instructions in stage3/README to disable debuginfo for now -
there are many different ways to do this, I've just covered one there)
More after I sleep, etc.
Jon.
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 08:23 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 08:01 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I've uploaded the first package I've built using the rootfs:
http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/armv7hl/
(follow the instructions in stage3/README to disable debuginfo
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 05:15 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:47 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Thanks to the hard work of many people (including Stefan's contribution
this morning to get some of the final nss bits and RPM in place, and of
course the groundwork put in place
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 13:59 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 05:15 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:47 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Thanks to the hard work of many people (including Stefan's contribution
this morning to get some of the final nss bits
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 20:14 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 13:59 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I know it's good to bind mount /proc, it's probably a good idea
anyway. I'm also not against agreeing to drop this patch, but I'm
not in favor of dropping it just to support some
Folks,
There are currently 81 RPMs for armv7hl at the following location:
http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/armv7hl/
I'll sync up more as we go...on the way to a buildroot!
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
DJ,
The permissions on /dev/null needed fixing, so I did. You'll need to
change your initial seed filesystem to reflect that anyone can write
into that file.
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 03:12 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 18:59 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Folks,
There are currently 81 RPMs for armv7hl at the following location:
http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/armv7hl/
I'll sync up more as we go...on the way
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 03:40 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I'm interested in collectively helping to solve the python bootstrap,
since it might take some effort, and it doesn't need to all be your
burden to solve. Therefore, can you let us know what you're doing so
far, what your suggested tack
Folks,
I would like to let you know that there is now an install of yum in the
armv7hl branch of the Fedora ARM git repo. You can pull this down
(following the bootstrap instructions from the VFAD if you have not done
this bit before) and chroot into it (bind mound /proc also first).
We still
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:52 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual
Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 8th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern
Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is to co-ordinate the
bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 23:27 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I would like to let you know that there is now an install of yum in the
armv7hl branch of the Fedora ARM git repo. You can pull this down
(following the bootstrap instructions from the VFAD if you have not done
this bit before) and chroot
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 00:46 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
rpm.armv7hl 4.9.0-9arm
installed
rpm-apidocs.noarch 4.9.0-9arm
installed
rpm-build.armv7hl4.9.0-9arm
installed
rpm-build-libs.armv7hl
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 00:07 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
The tar file pretty much says it all
http://fedora.roving-it.com/rootfs-f14-alpha1.tar.bz2
The same instructions that were used for the F-13 rootfs are relevant.
I'm tested it on a beagleboard XM and it seems to work OK. Note you
Folks,
The rootfs continues to grow and now has the latest packages built by
myself, Dennis, and others. We're rapidly approaching the point wherein
we can run mock. If you have some cycles and want to help, please assist
us in building the dependencies for userspace so that we can have all
of
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 03:20 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap
Please note that this has been updated since last week. It now includes
all of the information you need for stage3 (current). Further, there
is an additional wiki
Folks,
We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual
Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 15th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern
Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is to co-ordinate the
bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating point).
Last week, we succeeded in
Hello,
I'm traveling this week, so didn't make any specific plans to host the
VFAD earlier today. Sorry for not announcing that. Of course, there's no
reason to not build and contribute bits by joining us on #fedora-arm at
any time, and by following the instructions:
Folks,
We're at the point of beginning mock builds. I'm currently trying to get
the rootfs updated to assist with this, but I need a bit longer. I'll
send out an email later about that. Meanwhile, if you want to help out
in the short term, we need help getting a working qt4 build.
Jon.
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 05:05 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I'll look into it later on. I suspect it won't be long before the rootfs
in git is able to run mock properly, too. At least I've moved things
along today with fixed perl, yum, etc.
If someone wants to pull down the latest rootfs and send
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:37 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I have created a f15 rootfs
http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/rootfs-f15-hfp-20110818.tar.bz2
Thanks (as I've said elsewhere, but let me repeat here). This works
great. I have a builder online now at home and will bring some more
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:16 -0400, omall...@msu.edu wrote:
Is there a FAD today? And if so, what is the topic?
Yup. Sending out the announcement now.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
To participate, visit the following link:
http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/f15hardfp/bootstrap
Hi Dennis,
Can you dig into what's up with arm-temp?
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:12 +0200, Zoran Pericic wrote:
I can see you have problem with qt in stage4. I have compiled it in
stage3 with two patches. First one solves error: output number 1 not
directly addressable, second just force armv6 (which qt currently support).
You can found
Hi again Konstantin,
A number of folks in the Fedora ARM community are experiencing problems
with the Trimslice internal SSD dropping off the USB bus following a
forced bus reset (we are unclear why this happens under load). This
sometimes results in the SSD going readonly, or disappearing
Folks,
I meant to get to this already...but I'm short on time today.
If anyone has time, it would be super awesome to get the F15 bootstrap
docs updated on the wiki, explaining the stage4 process. I hope to get
back to this tonight...but if you have cycles, and are able to cover
this, let me
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 23:18 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
The armv7 distro bootstrap have run into a number of packages failing to
compile in Thumb mode (default enabled in rpmrc)
It shouldn't be enabled. I'll go look again, but remember that we
override what's in the global RPM config via
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 03:43 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 23:18 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
The armv7 distro bootstrap have run into a number of packages failing to
compile in Thumb mode (default enabled in rpmrc)
It shouldn't be enabled. I'll go look again
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 09:14 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Folks,
We decided long ago[0] to disable Thumb/Thumb2 in the Fedora ARM world.
Due to the RPM macros being out of date, we were not actually disabling
the default
Folks,
I've had a few conversations with stakeholders involved in Fedora 15
work, both on IRC, by email, and on the phone. I would like to make a
proposal for our plan of action in the short term.
ARMv7 bootstrap stage4
--
We will continue to build ARMv7 packages in the
Hey aph,
Copying Fedora ARM public mailing list. See also #fedora-arm on Freenode
if you'd like to swing by and talk about Java packages :)
I need some advice. We're 13 packages shy of a minimal package set for
F15 (if we exclude things like Firefox and Open^WLibreOffice for now).
Here are the
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 21:59 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 00:32 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
Also, do our hacked rpm yum versions work for both arch versions
currently? If not then that should be fixed as soon as possible to allow
builders to build for both targets.
Folks,
Please sign up to the cross-distro list if you would like to be involved
in future discussions:
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
Jon.
---BeginMessage---
[ Please forward this to anyone else who should get a copy - and ask
them to signup to cross-distro@linaro
Folks,
I have requested that the platform arm be created in Bugzilla after
discussing this with David last week. We can use it as a catch-all to
reduce the confusion as some users don't know armv7 from arm9 or arm11!
We can of course add others, but I like arm to be in there.
Jon.
Folks,
Just a quick note that Red Hat is growing over time, and we *might* in
due course have an opening for a test engineer who would get some time
to help with Fedora ARM. In this case it would likely only be applicable
if you're based in the Boston area, but I'm always interested in hearing
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 13:56 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:10:28PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 10:22 +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Is there a script already available that generates a package dependency
tree from src.rpms? At the moment
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7-srpms.html
I added a new shade of purple for the .0.armN case to indicate the
difference between we added an arm-specific patch (12) and we just
changed the spec files (91).
DJ, I would like to
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 01:02 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv7-srpms.html
I added a new shade of purple for the .0.armN case to indicate the
difference between we added an arm-specific patch (12) and we
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 21:22 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
Been a rather intense discussion regarding U-Boot on IRC today, and time
for some reflections and a little decision to be taken.
Well, maybe ;)
In stage3 we do have an u-boot package which provides uboot images for
pandaboard,
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:09 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
for rawhide. two reasons for this. one to become a primary arch at some
point we need to be
Hi Folks,
I wrote this article in today's edition of Linux Weekly News:
http://lwn.net/Articles/463506/
Enjoy.
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
At its annual TechCon event in Santa Clara today, ARM announced ARMv8,
its new 64-bit version of the ARM Architecture. The Fedora ARM community
is excited to learn more about the new architecture, and we look forward
to supporting ARMv8 in a future release of Fedora. As the 8th iteration
of the
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 16:59 -0500, Chris Tyler wrote:
I propose a VFAD to clean up and reconcile armv5tel/armv7hl pre-koji
package sets and prep for koji startup:
When: Nov 14 - 11:00 am EST / 8:00 am PST / 15:00 UTC
where:#fedora-arm
What: armv5tel-armv7hl package set
Chris,
Thanks for organizing this yesterday. To add to your list of topics,
Peter and I discussed the plan for getting to rawhide. He wants to drive
this, and that's cool with me. The intention is that as soon as it is
possible to begin doing builds, we should begin that activity in
parallel. So
Folks,
This week's VFAD was beneficial, but we need to keep momentum as we head
toward final builds in Koji of Fedora 15. Therefore, I believe it is
essential to the effort that we hold a weekly VFAD until we're done.
I propose Monday Nov. 21st at 11am Eastern. Before then, we will compile
a
Folks,
My take on current progress is that we have a lot of packages with bits still
needing to head upstream, and we have a number of package deltas between v5 and
v7, but the core set of packages we actually need to get a minimal build done
is about there. Minus:
* gcc - making sure the
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:03 -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 11/17/2011 11:04 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
I agree with going with what we've currently got package-wise. But
saying we should start building today or get Koji running...tomorrow
is missing the point.
:) I'm not so sure. I think the
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 21:55 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 21:48 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:03 -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
- we've pruned the package sets back to the same core
I think this is straightforward. We include in the repos only
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 22:21 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
I've taken a moment to ask one of my pretty chart scripts to dump a
list of all SRPMs that are nvr-identical in both v5 and v7
repos-so-far. I put the list here:
http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/arm-v5-v7-same.txt
The list
Hi Chris,
There was some dialog on IRC recently about compile flags. As near as I
can see it, we ought to be consistent in r-r-c between v5 and v7. Did I
miss something in particular? Just tying up some loose ends here.
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 19:59 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote:
fre 2011-11-18 klockan 00:30 -0500 skrev Jon Masters:
There was some dialog on IRC recently about compile flags. As near as I
can see it, we ought to be consistent in r-r-c between v5 and v7. Did I
miss something in particular
Folks,
I would like to make you aware of the following initial v8 ISA docs:
https://silver.arm.com/browse/AR100
Jon.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 23:15 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
I should like to know how we are doing with Koji builds? Can you provide
an update on current build progress, and let us know whether we should
have a focused VFAD on Monday? I ask because it's going to be December
shortly
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
