On 3/4/20 10:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Thanks Paul. I just tried Fedora-Workstation-32-20200225.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz on
my RPi4 but it behaves the same as I previously reported. There is a 5 minute
pause after the eth0 link becomes ready and I then wind up in the dracut
emergency shell.
> Thanks Paul. I just tried
> Fedora-Workstation-32-20200225.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz on my RPi4 but it
> behaves the same as I previously reported. There is a 5 minute pause
> after the eth0 link becomes ready and I then wind up in the dracut
> emergency shell.
> >>>
>
On 3/4/20 8:34 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Thanks Paul. I just tried Fedora-Workstation-32-20200225.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz on
my RPi4 but it behaves the same as I previously reported. There is a 5 minute
pause after the eth0 link becomes ready and I then wind up in the dracut
emergency shell.
> >> Thanks Paul. I just tried
> >> Fedora-Workstation-32-20200225.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz on my RPi4 but it
> >> behaves the same as I previously reported. There is a 5 minute pause
> >> after the eth0 link becomes ready and I then wind up in the dracut
> >> emergency shell.
> >
> > That's two
On 3/3/20 5:09 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I just tried Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz and it worked
properly. However, Fedora-Workstation-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
has a problem, as shown by the attached session.log file. I let it run for
a long period of time, and
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 3/3/20 3:12 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>>> I just tried Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz and it
>>> worked
>>> properly. However,
>>> Fedora-Workstation-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
>>> has a problem,
> >> I just tried Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz and it
> >> worked
> >> properly. However, Fedora-Workstation-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
> >> has a problem, as shown by the attached session.log file. I let it run for
> >> a long period of time, and after 5 or 10
On 3/3/20 3:12 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
Hi Steve,
I just tried Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz and it worked
properly. However, Fedora-Workstation-Rawhide-20200302.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
has a problem, as shown by the attached session.log file. I let it run for
a long period of
20200218 F32 Workstation worked (earliest I could see), 20200302 didn't
boot. Happy to binary chop to help find breaking change.
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 20:12, Paul Whalen wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 3/3/20 1:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020
Hi Steve,
- Original Message -
> On 3/3/20 1:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:56 PM Steven A. Falco
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/3/20 9:38 AM, Paul Kennedy wrote:
> >>> I've just tried the latest F32 and Rawhide workstation images, but
> >>> neither successfully
On 3/3/20 1:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:56 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 3/3/20 9:38 AM, Paul Kennedy wrote:
I've just tried the latest F32 and Rawhide workstation images, but neither
successfully booted for me. Both hung after eth0 came up, then sat for several
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:56 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> On 3/3/20 9:38 AM, Paul Kennedy wrote:
> > I've just tried the latest F32 and Rawhide workstation images, but neither
> > successfully booted for me. Both hung after eth0 came up, then sat for
> > several minutes before logging about
On 3/3/20 9:38 AM, Paul Kennedy wrote:
I've just tried the latest F32 and Rawhide workstation images, but neither
successfully booted for me. Both hung after eth0 came up, then sat for several
minutes before logging about dracut timeouts and then a recovery shell (mouse
and keyboard never
13 matches
Mail list logo
