RE: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread Burns, Erik
relatedly, how will this change (or has this changed?) given the fact that you can get a fairly good quality digital scan of a photo for a relatively low price - and reprint it from the file (or by rescanning) ad infinitum at no additional cost? seems that as the scanning/digitalization process

Re: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread Rodney F Weiher
I'm not a pro, but what are those brown strips of film that have impressions like the pictures you had developed that come back from Ritz when you get the pics? Burns, Erik wrote: relatedly, how will this change (or has this changed?) given the fact that you can get a fairly good quality

Re: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread Bryan Caplan
And of course normal developers always include the negatives. -- Prof. Bryan Caplan Department of Economics George Mason University http://www.bcaplan.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] He was thinking that Prince Andrei was in error and did

Re: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread Alex Tabarrok
Sure, if you take your own pictures you get the negatives. But if you hire a profesional photographer for say a wedding or if you have a portrait done they are insistent on keeping the negatives. Alex -- Dr. Alexander Tabarrok Vice President and Director of Research The Independent Institute

Re: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread John-charles Bradbury
Producing a photograph requires creating a negative and transfering it to a positive image. It would seem simple to separate the two processes. Certainly, a photographer ought to be able to sell the negatives for the PV of the positive image revenue. The industry probably does not specialize in

Re: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread debacker
The professional photographer keeping the negatives may be because that photo is his/her property and he/she is trying to protect the unauthorized use of it. A photo development shop just prints your photos where as the pro is taking them and so they are his/hers. I am guessing this is the

Re: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread Bryan Caplan
Alex Tabarrok wrote: Sure, if you take your own pictures you get the negatives. But if you hire a profesional photographer for say a wedding or if you have a portrait done they are insistent on keeping the negatives. What's wrong with a simple adverse selection story here? The only people

Re: Photographers

2002-01-23 Thread Alex Tabarrok
Tbe adverse selection story, really a price discrimination story, assumes monopoly power in the photography market. But there is free entry into photography and hundreds of photographers easily available in the phone book thus price should fall to MC which implies that photographers should be

Credit scoring and insurance premiums

2002-01-23 Thread James Haney
I just saw an article in Business Week discussing the growing use of credit scores over the past couple years to determine auto and homeowners' insurance premiums. This practice has become controversial because it has sometimes meant hefty premium increases for people who don't seem to be