I do agree that one of the few applications of i. and s. effects is to
labor supply (this was mentioned in my first post). (This is because
labor is one of the few goods where the income effect is likely to be
large.) Hence that is the context in which I teach the material. It is
appalling, th
Note that the U.S. has lower welfare spending, higher military spending
*and* lower government spending over all than Europe. Thus if the U.S.
government spent as much as the Europeans we could have just as large a
welfare and a warfare state. The fact that we don't indicates that at a
minimum
So far we have that i. and s. effects are useful to
a) teach Marshallian demand
b) teach difference between nominal and real income
c) students going on to graduate school
d) useful but for reasons that can't be remembered! :)
e) useful as a hurdle/signal
f) not useful at the intermediate/mba l
Almost every intermediate micro text spends a great deal of time on
income versus substitution effects. This is a somewhat tricky concept
for students to understand so one would hope that the payoff to learning
the idea is high. But what is the payoff? One of the few applications
is to labor
Yes, Bill's points about surveys are technically correct but Kleck was
aware of these issues and tried to design a survey to handle them as
best as is possible. See Kleck's papers for details.
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 2
What doesn't come through in the Lott material on Slate is that the 98%
figure is one sentence in a big book. The vast bulk of Lott's work on
shall-issue laws is based on publicly available data. The best figure
on defensive gun use involving brandishment only is from a survey by
Kleck and it is
the best piece I have seen on these issues is in Regulation. Here
http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv24n1/coate.pdf
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 22030
Tel. 703-993-2314
Web Page: http://mason.gmu.edu/~atabarro/
and
Bryan D Caplan wrote:
Another annoying thing about the "I told you there was a bubble" people
is that a good chunk of the stock market crash can be attributed to the
9/11 attacks (more specifically, indirect effects via policy changes).
If ever there were a random shock, it was 9/11.
Shame on
Accounting costs is the correct term. Most micro textbooks contain a
discussion of the difference between accounting and economic costs.
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 22030
Tel. 703-993-2314
Web Page: http://mason.gmu.edu/~
Fabio wrote "Movie studios owners only care about profits, while opera owners consume both money and art." Quite right. You can find a general model of this sort of behaviour with implications in:
Cowen, Tyler and Alexander Tabarrok. 2000. A Economic Theory of Avant-Garde and Popular Art, or H
Nice piece from the Economist, posted by Brad DeLong, on the insanity of
economic policies in Zimbabwe. It's like something out of the dark
ages, i.e. the 1960s and 70s.
Alex
http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/archives/001179.html
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN
Jonathan Rauch has a very clever piece on the recent idea to tax fat
foods. Only Rauch has a much "better" idea. Now why didn't I think of
that?
Alex
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/12/rauch.htm
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA,
The classic paper on this issue:
The Economic Organization of a P.O.W. Camp, R.A. Radford, Economica,
November, 1945
http://academic.bellevue.edu/~jpatton/micro/pow.html
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 22030
Tel. 703-993-2314
and
Basically you are talking about expected utility theory without the
independence axiom. See
Mark Machina Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,
Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (Summer 1987) 121-154.
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason Un
The best way to think about RE is that it is a consistency stricture
that says that the agents in your model of the economy should not be
less informed than you are. If you know the model then they should too
and the equilibrium defined accordingly.
Note that this perspective leaves it op
In my view, there are costs to going out early and few benefits.
First, there is the nightmare scenario in which you get a job that
requires you to teach while still trying to finish your dissertation -
beware, these rocks have sunk many a ship. You should not go out unless
you are confide
Cyril Morong wrote:
> Alexander Tabarrok wrote:
>
>now being offered on a limited basis. This is an interesting product in
> that the idea is in large part driven by academics like Robert Shiller.
>
> http://www.forbes.com/2002/08/28/0829whynot.html
>
> see also the chapter on macro m
The focus of the discussion has been on whether college students do the
math of attending college. Perhaps a better question is whether those
young people not in college have done the math.
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 22030
Tel
Insurance against changes in home prices is for the first time now being
offered on a limited basis. This is an interesting product in that the
idea is in large part driven by academics like Robert Shiller.
http://www.forbes.com/2002/08/28/0829whynot.html
see also the chapter on macro markets in
Bill is quite correct that variation in "discount rates," (which could
also be something like how much you enjoy schooling for its own sake)
can explain the fact that IV estimates are higher than OLS estimates.
Bryan's question, however, can be rephrased as not how do you explain
the data (low abil
Warning: Some shameless self-promotion as well as promotion of
bepress.com
My most recent paper, Patent Theory versus Patent Law, has just been
published by the B.E. journal, Contributions to Economic Analysis &
Policy. You can find the article and abstract here (abstract is also
below)
http:
Krugman finally gets back to economics and says something pretty smart
about productivity, unemployment and growth.
http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/jobs.html
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 22030
Tel. 703-993-2314
and
Dir
Sherwin Rosen's paper "Potato Paradoxes" in the December 1999 JPE is
well worth reading. I believe this was his last paper.
Nominally, the paper is about a new explanation for Giffen like
behavior but more generally it is about the interesting dynamics that
can occur when a good has a dual r
A few years ago I cribbed some nice examples of marginal versus average
cost from a microeconomics textbook. The examples involved case studies
of Franklin National Bank and Continental Airlines. Now I can't locate
the original discussion. Does anyone know the source?
Thanks
Alex Tabarrok
Dep
24 matches
Mail list logo