I am, the 12% pro-outsourcing response is much higher than I'd expect!
on 2/11/04 11:55 AM, Bryan Caplan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not the least surprised by these results:
http://poll.excite.com/poll/home.jsp?cat_id=1
--
Prof. Bryan Caplan
Department of Economics George Mason
Conversely, I could argue that all of the music I've ever downloaded from a
P2P network was fair use, since it did not reduce royalties. Why? All I
have to do is claim that I would have never purchased the music at the
market price.
on 9/5/03 3:08 PM, Steve Miller at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I seem to remember Bart and Lisa Simpson arguing over whether or not two
wrongs make a right. BTW, Homer agrees with you. ;-) Call me naive, but
I'm on Lisa's side.
I guess that's where I'd ultimately disagree with Magneto, too.
on 9/5/03 3:19 PM, Aschwin de Wolf at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would only pay the kid so far as he forced me to pay, and even then I
would find a way to pay as little as possible. But I wouldn't deny my
neighbor's right to own and maintain a lawn at his own expense.
on 9/5/03 2:14 PM, alypius skinner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because *we,* the
That still avoids my distinction between rhetoric and policy.
on 9/5/03 3:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/4/03 11:03:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here I have to disagree with you Steve. :) The Republican party's ideology
runs from classical
a
contract between buyer and seller. I guess they now have EULAs and such
with some media, but not others.
on 9/5/03 3:56 PM, Fred Foldvary at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Steve Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another example: copying under fair use can reduce royalties. Suppose I
buy Microsoft
on 9/4/03 8:26 AM, Aschwin de Wolf at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Illegals knowingly break federal law. Many libertarians say they only break
laws that shouldn't exist anyway. But this made me wonder. The overwhelming
majority of illegal immigrants do not have libertarians views (to put it
mildly).
on 9/4/03 3:02 PM, alypius skinner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the implication here was so obvious it did not need to be spelled
out, but I guess I was mistaken (jab, jab). Importing new voters from very
unlibertarian political cultures will further diminish, if not eventually
Do I have to avoid a preference-based explanation? What if I dig up some
evidence of trends in human behavior that support my claim?
Maybe what angers voters is not the scandal, but hypocrisy. Someone who is
perceived as liberal on social issues is less of a hypocrite for having an
affair than
But at least I've explained away Packwood, Livingston, etc. ;-)
on 6/3/03 12:23 AM, Bryan Caplan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Miller wrote:
Maybe what angers voters is not the scandal, but hypocrisy. Someone who is
perceived as liberal on social issues is less of a hypocrite
10 matches
Mail list logo
