RE: # buyers = # sellers ?

2001-09-25 Thread James Sproule
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: # buyers = # sellers ? folks: isn't the point here that - at the moment a trade is executed - the number of buyers and the number of sellers are equal. before that, though, there can be more people seeking to sell than seeking to buy (or vice versa) and that is why prices change

RE: # buyers = # sellers ?

2001-09-25 Thread Chris Nuttall
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Burns, Erik Sent: 24 September 2001 18:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: # buyers = # sellers ? folks: isn't the point here that - at the moment a trade is executed - the number of buyers and the number of sellers are equal. before that, though, there can be more people

RE: # buyers = # sellers ?

2001-09-24 Thread Burns, Erik
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Dickens Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 4:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: # buyers = # sellers ? I never said that # buyers always and everywhere # of sellers. I specifically said if the market

RE: # buyers = # sellers ?

2001-09-21 Thread James Sproule
Economists (and I am one) can smirk at commentators saying 'that there are more buyers than sellers', but from a market practioners point of view, that is certainly how it feels at times. Financial markets have traders who maintain large stocks of whatever they are trading. When a piece of

RE: # buyers = # sellers ?

2001-09-21 Thread William Dickens
I never said that # buyers always and everywhere # of sellers. I specifically said if the market is operating there is a buyer for every seller. It is certainly true that specialists on the floor of the NYSE often suspend trading in a stock when there is an imbalance of orders and that bids on