Chresten Anderson wrote:
Lomborg's primary problem is not accepting the economics behind his claim;
that we are not running out of ressources. And without the understanding
that a market is necessary to price the environment he does not get the
reasons why the environment is getting better rather
Ashlie, it would be good if you could let us know when it's published and a web
site.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, if you are interested in a review of Lomborg's book by a non-economist
> who is right-thinking nonetheless (and an excellent jurist), check out 9th
> Circuit Court of Appeals Ju
Also, if you are interested in a review of Lomborg's book by a non-economist
who is right-thinking nonetheless (and an excellent jurist), check out 9th
Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Alex Kozinski's review in an upcoming issue of
the Michigan Law Review. The issue is dated May 2002 but hasn't
I assume that you have visited his website http://www.lomborg.com
there you may find answers to many of your questions
I am not an environmental economist, but welcome (and agree with) most
if not all of the things that lomborg has said. And the fact that it
needed to be said has in my view be
